Comparative Evaluation of Root Resorption in First Upper Premolars Treated with Active and Passive Self-ligating Brackets: A Prospective Split-mouth Study

Introduction This prospective observational split-mouth study aimed to compare the effect of self-ligating bracket type (active versus passive) on the extent of Orthodontically Induced Inflammatory Root Resorption (OIIRR) in maxillary first premolars during alignment, leveling, and initial torque expression in orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods A split-mouth design was employed in 10 patients (7 females, 3 males; 20 maxillary first premolars). Each patient received simultaneous orthodontic treatment with active and passive self-ligating brackets. The right side was randomly assigned to active self-ligating brackets (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany), and the contralateral side to passive self-ligating brackets of the same manufacturer. After nine months, both premolars were extracted and analyzed using a 3D Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (Lext OLS 4000, Olympus Corporation). Volumetric measurements of resorption craters (area, volume, and depth) were obtained with specialized software. Results No statistically significant differences were observed in the extent of external root resorption between active and passive self-ligating brackets. Both bracket systems showed comparable mean values for resorption area, volume, and depth. Discussion This study provides the first direct intra-patient comparison of active versus passive self-ligating brackets, eliminating inter-individual variability. Findings suggest that the biological response leading to OIIRR is comparable between both bracket systems, indicating that individual biological susceptibility may outweigh the mechanical differences in bracket clip design during the initial stages of treatment. Conclusion Passive and active self-ligating brackets produce comparable levels of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption during early stages of treatment. Orthodontic forces should be maintained at the lowest biologically acceptable levels to minimize iatrogenic effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Dentistry Journal
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118742106442229260505110904
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of Root Resorption in First Upper Premolars Treated with Active and Passive Self-ligating Brackets: A Prospective Split-mouth Study

Jorge José Pavani Carrillo, María Elsa Gómez de Ferraris, Alfredo A. Bass Pluer
The Open Dentistry Journal
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Comparative Evaluation of Root Resorption in First Upper Premolars Treated with Active and Passive Self-ligating Brackets: A Prospective Split-mouth Study

Jorge José Pavani Carrillo, María Elsa Gómez de Ferraris, Alfredo A. Bass Pluer
article en

Abstract

Introduction This prospective observational split-mouth study aimed to compare the effect of self-ligating bracket type (active versus passive) on the extent of Orthodontically Induced Inflammatory Root Resorption (OIIRR) in maxillary first premolars during alignment, leveling, and initial torque expression in orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods A split-mouth design was employed in 10 patients (7 females, 3 males; 20 maxillary first premolars). Each patient received simultaneous orthodontic treatment with active and passive self-ligating brackets. The right side was randomly assigned to active self-ligating brackets (Forestadent, Pforzheim, Germany), and the contralateral side to passive self-ligating brackets of the same manufacturer. After nine months, both premolars were extracted and analyzed using a 3D Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope (Lext OLS 4000, Olympus Corporation). Volumetric measurements of resorption craters (area, volume, and depth) were obtained with specialized software. Results No statistically significant differences were observed in the extent of external root resorption between active and passive self-ligating brackets. Both bracket systems showed comparable mean values for resorption area, volume, and depth. Discussion This study provides the first direct intra-patient comparison of active versus passive self-ligating brackets, eliminating inter-individual variability. Findings suggest that the biological response leading to OIIRR is comparable between both bracket systems, indicating that individual biological susceptibility may outweigh the mechanical differences in bracket clip design during the initial stages of treatment. Conclusion Passive and active self-ligating brackets produce comparable levels of orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption during early stages of treatment. Orthodontic forces should be maintained at the lowest biologically acceptable levels to minimize iatrogenic effects.

The Open Dentistry JournalVol. 20(1)
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Evaluation of Root Resorption in First Upper Premolars Treated with Active and Passive Self-ligating Brackets: A Prospective Split-mouth Study — Jorge José Pavani Carrillo, María Elsa Gómez de Ferraris, et al. · The Open Dentistry Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS