Determinants of Definitive Full Pulpotomy Adoption in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Multivariable Analysis of Dental Trainee Decision-Making

Background: Full pulpotomy has gained increasing attention as a conservative treatment option for managing complicated crown fractures and pulp exposures in mature permanent teeth. However, little is known about how undergraduate dental students perceive this treatment approach and which factors influence their willingness to adopt it in clinical practice. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate undergraduate dental students’ knowledge, attitudes, and preferences regarding full pulpotomy and to identify factors associated with willingness to use full pulpotomy as a definitive treatment option. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among fourth- and fifth-year dental students. The questionnaire evaluated participants’ treatment preferences, perceived procedural difficulties, preferred pulp capping materials, attitudes toward rubber dam use, perceived barriers to full pulpotomy adoption, and willingness to use full pulpotomy as a definitive treatment. Associations between variables were assessed using chi-square tests and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis. Results: In total, 255 undergraduate dental students participated in the study. Spontaneous pain (69.4%), prolonged pain to heat (50.6%), percussion sensitivity (46.7%), and radiographic findings (43.9%) were the most frequently reported diagnostic criteria for symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. In the standardized clinical scenario, a pulpotomy-based approach was the most preferred treatment strategy (45.1%), followed by single-visit pulpectomy with obturation (28.6%) and pulpectomy with calcium hydroxide dressing (24.7%). MTA was the most preferred pulp capping material (57.3%), followed by Biodentin (12.9%) and calcium hydroxide (8.2%). Overall, 55.7% of participants reported willingness to use full pulpotomy as a definitive treatment option. Clinical year, previous exposure to pulpotomy cases, and confidence in bleeding control were independently associated with willingness to use full pulpotomy. Previous performance of pulpotomy procedures and attitude toward mandatory rubber dam use were independently associated with greater willingness to use full pulpotomy, whereas perceived barriers and uncertainty regarding implementation were negatively associated. Conclusions: In this single-center, questionnaire-based study, undergraduate dental students generally showed a positive attitude toward full pulpotomy; however, acceptance was strongly influenced by practical experience, confidence in procedural protocols, and perceived implementation barriers. These findings may help inform future educational strategies aimed at improving confidence and supporting evidence-based adoption of conservative pulp-preserving approaches.