Editorial Assessment: Manuscript Review (SSRN: 5389294) – The Illusory Normativity of Rights-Based AI Regulation

Executive Summary:This editorial assessment presents a structured, independent evaluation of the manuscript “The Illusory Normativity of Rights-Based AI Regulation” (SSRN: 5389294). Utilizing Comparative Institutional Analysis, this audit evaluates the authors' critique of the "Brussels Effect" and the global presumption that European AI regulation is a purely rights-driven endeavor. Key Evaluative Components: Macro-Evaluation: Analysis of the axiomatic vs. technocratic shift in EU regulatory style. Methodological Audit: Assessment of analytical framework integrity, case selection adequacy, and conceptual stability. Citation Architecture: Evaluation of canonical literature coverage, citation distribution balance, and contemporary relevance. Editorial Risk Mapping: Identification of institutional epistemic risks, including the "Compliance-only" culture and its potential impact on the academic and legal commons. Reviewer Positioning:This assessment is intended as a micro-level editorial and technical evaluation. It serves as a demonstrable sample of high-level manuscript auditing, focusing on research positioning, analytical robustness, and publication readiness. Editorial Integrity Note:This document is authored by Zeus Dutta Roy, Independent Scientific Peer Reviewer and Research Quality Specialist. It provides a structured editorial diagnostic and does not replace formal journal peer review or editorial board adjudication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20183877
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Editorial Assessment: Manuscript Review (SSRN: 5389294) – The Illusory Normativity of Rights-Based AI Regulation

Zeus Dutta Roy
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Editorial Assessment: Manuscript Review (SSRN: 5389294) – The Illusory Normativity of Rights-Based AI Regulation

Zeus Dutta Roy
article en

Abstract

Executive Summary:This editorial assessment presents a structured, independent evaluation of the manuscript “The Illusory Normativity of Rights-Based AI Regulation” (SSRN: 5389294). Utilizing Comparative Institutional Analysis, this audit evaluates the authors' critique of the "Brussels Effect" and the global presumption that European AI regulation is a purely rights-driven endeavor. Key Evaluative Components: Macro-Evaluation: Analysis of the axiomatic vs. technocratic shift in EU regulatory style. Methodological Audit: Assessment of analytical framework integrity, case selection adequacy, and conceptual stability. Citation Architecture: Evaluation of canonical literature coverage, citation distribution balance, and contemporary relevance. Editorial Risk Mapping: Identification of institutional epistemic risks, including the "Compliance-only" culture and its potential impact on the academic and legal commons. Reviewer Positioning:This assessment is intended as a micro-level editorial and technical evaluation. It serves as a demonstrable sample of high-level manuscript auditing, focusing on research positioning, analytical robustness, and publication readiness. Editorial Integrity Note:This document is authored by Zeus Dutta Roy, Independent Scientific Peer Reviewer and Research Quality Specialist. It provides a structured editorial diagnostic and does not replace formal journal peer review or editorial board adjudication.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
European Commission (BE), Island Peer Review Organization (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.