Development and Performance of a Combination of Hydroxyapatite with a Collagen Membrane for Tissue Regeneration

In medicine and dentistry, bone-loss treatment often uses hydroxyapatite combined with collagen membranes. The biocompatibility of these biomaterials depends on their composition and physical/mechanical properties. In this study, a graft composed of synthetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticle (Blue Bone®) and a bovine type I collagen membrane (Green Membrane Perio®) was developed compared with commercial Bio-Oss® graft and Mucograft® membrane. The materials were characterized by roughness, wettability, tensile testing, DSC, SEM, and TEM. In vivo, temporoparietal bone defects were created in 40 Wistar rats divided into five groups (n = 8): sham (no biomaterial); Bio-Oss®; Bio-Oss® + Mucograft®; Blue-Bone®; and Blue-Bone® + Green Membrane Perio®. Immunohistochemistry showed Green Membrane Perio® was made of thin, well-organized type I collagen fibers and was free of contaminants. Immunohistochemistry, histology, and immunohistochemical analyses indicated that Blue Bone® and Green Membrane Perio® were biocompatible and supported tissue regeneration. The Blue Bone® groups demonstrated higher collagen content than the Bio-Oss® + Mucograft® group. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes included morphological, thermal, mechanical, and surface property measurements, as well as cellular compatibility testing. The results showed comparable wettability and surface roughness, adequate membrane tensile strength, osteoconductive nanoparticle morphology, no adverse inflammatory reactions, and similar new bone formation metrics compared with controls. In conclusion, the combination of synthetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (Blue Bone®) and a bovine type I collagen membrane (Green Membrane Perio®) showed good performance when compared to established products and was considered safe and biocompatible for bone repair applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Composites Science
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs10050266
Primary Topic
Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Performance of a Combination of Hydroxyapatite with a Collagen Membrane for Tissue Regeneration

Carlos Nelson Elias, Ana Lúcia Rosa Nascimento, J V De Carvalho, Bianca Torres Ciambarella et al.
Journal of Composites Science
Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
article

Development and Performance of a Combination of Hydroxyapatite with a Collagen Membrane for Tissue Regeneration

Carlos Nelson Elias, Ana Lúcia Rosa Nascimento, J V De Carvalho, Bianca Torres Ciambarella, Igor da Silva Brum, Mário José dos Santos Pereira, Marco Antônio Alencar de Carvalho, Lúcio Frigo, Victor Hugo Viera de Oliveira Araujo
article en

Abstract

In medicine and dentistry, bone-loss treatment often uses hydroxyapatite combined with collagen membranes. The biocompatibility of these biomaterials depends on their composition and physical/mechanical properties. In this study, a graft composed of synthetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticle (Blue Bone®) and a bovine type I collagen membrane (Green Membrane Perio®) was developed compared with commercial Bio-Oss® graft and Mucograft® membrane. The materials were characterized by roughness, wettability, tensile testing, DSC, SEM, and TEM. In vivo, temporoparietal bone defects were created in 40 Wistar rats divided into five groups (n = 8): sham (no biomaterial); Bio-Oss®; Bio-Oss® + Mucograft®; Blue-Bone®; and Blue-Bone® + Green Membrane Perio®. Immunohistochemistry showed Green Membrane Perio® was made of thin, well-organized type I collagen fibers and was free of contaminants. Immunohistochemistry, histology, and immunohistochemical analyses indicated that Blue Bone® and Green Membrane Perio® were biocompatible and supported tissue regeneration. The Blue Bone® groups demonstrated higher collagen content than the Bio-Oss® + Mucograft® group. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes included morphological, thermal, mechanical, and surface property measurements, as well as cellular compatibility testing. The results showed comparable wettability and surface roughness, adequate membrane tensile strength, osteoconductive nanoparticle morphology, no adverse inflammatory reactions, and similar new bone formation metrics compared with controls. In conclusion, the combination of synthetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (Blue Bone®) and a bovine type I collagen membrane (Green Membrane Perio®) showed good performance when compared to established products and was considered safe and biocompatible for bone repair applications.

Journal of Composites ScienceVol. 10(5)
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Military Institute of Engineering (BR), Associação Paulista de Medicina (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.