Prenatal Screening Via cfDNA – Paired‐End Sequencing Utilizing Fragment Size Information Reduces the Screen Positive Rate for X Chromosome Aneuploidies

ABSTRACT Objective Prenatal cfDNA screening has transformed care, yet it remains difficult to determine whether X aneuploidy signals originate from the patient or fetus, inflating screen positive and false positive rates. One potential solution is to incorporate fragment size data from paired‐end sequencing (PES). Method We use a large clinical cohort to examine the effect of incorporating fragment size information via PES on the performance of cfDNA screening for X chromosome aneuploidies. Within the same patients ( n = 118,859), we compare screen positive rates for monosomy X (MX) and trisomy X (XXX) before and after incorporation of fragment size data. Additionally, we examine the rate of reported false positives from patients tested via PES versus single‐end sequencing (SES, n = 141,364), which lacks fragment size. Results Incorporation of fragment size data from PES significantly reduced the screen positive rates for MX (−49.1%, 227/446) and XXX (−42.9%, 60/105). The rate of voluntarily reported MX false positives was lower among patients with PES fragment size information (0.0033%) compared with SES (0.0085%). No XXX false positives were reported. Conclusion The results illustrate that the screen positive rate can be reduced by leveraging fragment size data from paired‐end sequencing. This has the potential to reduce false positive rates in clinical cfDNA prenatal screening.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Prenatal Diagnosis
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.70169
Primary Topic
Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prenatal Screening Via cfDNA – Paired‐End Sequencing Utilizing Fragment Size Information Reduces the Screen Positive Rate for X Chromosome Aneuploidies

S. Kim, Susan Hancock, Eileen de Feo, Franchesca Liao et al.
Prenatal Diagnosis
Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
article

Prenatal Screening Via cfDNA – Paired‐End Sequencing Utilizing Fragment Size Information Reduces the Screen Positive Rate for X Chromosome Aneuploidies

S. Kim, Susan Hancock, Eileen de Feo, Franchesca Liao, Theresa Boomer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Prenatal cfDNA screening has transformed care, yet it remains difficult to determine whether X aneuploidy signals originate from the patient or fetus, inflating screen positive and false positive rates. One potential solution is to incorporate fragment size data from paired‐end sequencing (PES). Method We use a large clinical cohort to examine the effect of incorporating fragment size information via PES on the performance of cfDNA screening for X chromosome aneuploidies. Within the same patients ( n = 118,859), we compare screen positive rates for monosomy X (MX) and trisomy X (XXX) before and after incorporation of fragment size data. Additionally, we examine the rate of reported false positives from patients tested via PES versus single‐end sequencing (SES, n = 141,364), which lacks fragment size. Results Incorporation of fragment size data from PES significantly reduced the screen positive rates for MX (−49.1%, 227/446) and XXX (−42.9%, 60/105). The rate of voluntarily reported MX false positives was lower among patients with PES fragment size information (0.0033%) compared with SES (0.0085%). No XXX false positives were reported. Conclusion The results illustrate that the screen positive rate can be reduced by leveraging fragment size data from paired‐end sequencing. This has the potential to reduce false positive rates in clinical cfDNA prenatal screening.

Prenatal Diagnosis
Illumina (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.