Does acceptance of driver monitoring systems differ across countries? A latent profile analysis approach

• A large-scale survey ( N = 9025) examined drivers’ attitudes toward driver monitoring systems across nine countries. • Applied latent profile analysis to segment drivers based on acceptance, concerns, and behavioural intention to use DMS. • Identified five distinct user profiles: Enthusiasts, Somewhat enthusiastic, Moderate, Sceptical, and Resistant. • Cross-country comparisons revealed systematic differences in profile distribution. • Demographic analysis showed that older drivers and women are more likely to belong to the resistant profile. Driver Monitoring Systems (DMS) are poised to become a standard safety feature in new vehicles, with regulations in regions such as the European Union mandating their inclusion. Yet little is known about how privacy and security concerns influence their acceptance. This study investigated attitudes towards DMS among 9025 licensed drivers from nine countries (Germany, Spain, France, Japan, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States, and China). Participants rated their acceptance, concerns (including data collection, secondary use, and perceived insecurity), and behavioural intention to use DMS. Through Latent Profile Analysis, five distinct user profiles were identified: Enthusiasts, Somewhat enthusiastic, Moderate, Sceptical, and Resistant, each exhibiting systematic differences in acceptance, concerns, and behavioural intentions. Cross-national comparisons revealed significant cultural variations, with Enthusiasts and Somewhat enthusiastic profiles being more prevalent in China, whereas Resistant and Sceptical profiles were disproportionately represented in France, United Kingdom, and Sweden. Notably, age and gender effects were significant, as older drivers and women were more likely to belong to the resistant profile. These findings underscore the necessity for targeted interventions, transparent data handling policies, and culturally tailored communication strategies to enhance user acceptance of DMS and the widespread adoption as part of the broader transition towards automated and connected driving systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2026.108590
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does acceptance of driver monitoring systems differ across countries? A latent profile analysis approach

Esko Lehtonen, Elina Aittoniemi, Yee Mun Lee, İbrahim Öztürk et al.
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Does acceptance of driver monitoring systems differ across countries? A latent profile analysis approach

Esko Lehtonen, Elina Aittoniemi, Yee Mun Lee, İbrahim Öztürk, Natasha Merat, Ruth Madigan
article en

Abstract

• A large-scale survey ( N = 9025) examined drivers’ attitudes toward driver monitoring systems across nine countries. • Applied latent profile analysis to segment drivers based on acceptance, concerns, and behavioural intention to use DMS. • Identified five distinct user profiles: Enthusiasts, Somewhat enthusiastic, Moderate, Sceptical, and Resistant. • Cross-country comparisons revealed systematic differences in profile distribution. • Demographic analysis showed that older drivers and women are more likely to belong to the resistant profile. Driver Monitoring Systems (DMS) are poised to become a standard safety feature in new vehicles, with regulations in regions such as the European Union mandating their inclusion. Yet little is known about how privacy and security concerns influence their acceptance. This study investigated attitudes towards DMS among 9025 licensed drivers from nine countries (Germany, Spain, France, Japan, Poland, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States, and China). Participants rated their acceptance, concerns (including data collection, secondary use, and perceived insecurity), and behavioural intention to use DMS. Through Latent Profile Analysis, five distinct user profiles were identified: Enthusiasts, Somewhat enthusiastic, Moderate, Sceptical, and Resistant, each exhibiting systematic differences in acceptance, concerns, and behavioural intentions. Cross-national comparisons revealed significant cultural variations, with Enthusiasts and Somewhat enthusiastic profiles being more prevalent in China, whereas Resistant and Sceptical profiles were disproportionately represented in France, United Kingdom, and Sweden. Notably, age and gender effects were significant, as older drivers and women were more likely to belong to the resistant profile. These findings underscore the necessity for targeted interventions, transparent data handling policies, and culturally tailored communication strategies to enhance user acceptance of DMS and the widespread adoption as part of the broader transition towards automated and connected driving systems.

Accident Analysis & PreventionVol. 233
University of Leeds (GB), VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.