Diagnostic Value of Lymph Node Biopsy in Adult Patients with Classic Fever of Unknown Origin Accompanied by Lymphadenopathy

Background: Lymph node biopsy is an important means of etiologic diagnosis for patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) and lymphadenopathy. However, it is an invasive procedure and may yield negative results. It is worth exploring which kinds of patients could benefit most from lymph node biopsy. Methods: FUO patients (n = 242) who had lymphadenopathy and underwent lymph node biopsy were enrolled into this retrospective single-center study. Clinical manifestations were documented and risk factors suggestive of an underlying positive lymph node biopsy (providing diagnostic clues) and lymphoma were analyzed. Results: The etiologies were as follows: infectious disease in 10 (4.1%) cases, connective tissue diseases in 51 (21.1%) cases, neoplastic diseases in 57 (23.6%) cases, other diseases in 28 (11.6%) cases, and unknown diagnosis in 96 (39.7%) cases. A total of 88 patients (36.4%) were diagnosed through lymph node biopsy. The following four independent risk factors were found to be related to positive lymph node biopsy: male gender (OR 2.471; 95% CI 1.158–5.270; p = 0.019), no rash (OR 3.531; 95% CI 1.595–7.816; p = 0.002), shape index of the lymph node (OR 8.566; 95% CI 1.035–70.915; p = 0.046), and hypoalbuminemia (OR 3.370; 95% CI 1.470–7.728; p = 0.004). Later, 146 patients with a confirmed diagnosis (including 57 cases of lymphoma and 89 cases of non-lymphoma) were included in the analysis of lymphoma-related factors. Age older than 45 years (OR 8.663; 95% CI 3.045–24.647; p < 0.001), no rash (OR 4.946; 95% CI 1.646–14.859; p = 0.004), serositis (OR 3.588; 95% CI 1.137–11.318; p = 0.029), abnormal blood flow of the lymph node (OR 3.025; 95% CI 1.034–8.848; p = 0.043), abnormal central lymph nodes (OR 6.546; 95% CI 1.721–24.898; p = 0.006), focal lesions in the spleen (OR 13.386; 95% CI 2.067–86.706; p = 0.006), and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 250 U/L (OR 3.885; 95% CI 1.111–13.584; p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for lymphoma. Conclusions: Lymph node biopsy is a valuable diagnostic procedure for patients with FUO and lymphadenopathy. For male patients without rash, more rounded lymph nodes, and hypoalbuminemia, we strongly recommend lymph node biopsy. Age older than 45 years, no rash, serositis, abnormal blood flow of the lymph node, abnormal central lymph nodes, focal lesions in the spleen, and serum LDH > 250 U/L are risk factors suggesting an underlying lymphoma, and multi-site biopsy should be considered if necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15103792
Primary Topic
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic Value of Lymph Node Biopsy in Adult Patients with Classic Fever of Unknown Origin Accompanied by Lymphadenopathy

Huiting Liu, Xinchao Liu, Ying Ge, Xiaochun Shi et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
article

Diagnostic Value of Lymph Node Biopsy in Adult Patients with Classic Fever of Unknown Origin Accompanied by Lymphadenopathy

Huiting Liu, Xinchao Liu, Ying Ge, Xiaochun Shi, Guiren Ruan
article en

Abstract

Background: Lymph node biopsy is an important means of etiologic diagnosis for patients with fever of unknown origin (FUO) and lymphadenopathy. However, it is an invasive procedure and may yield negative results. It is worth exploring which kinds of patients could benefit most from lymph node biopsy. Methods: FUO patients (n = 242) who had lymphadenopathy and underwent lymph node biopsy were enrolled into this retrospective single-center study. Clinical manifestations were documented and risk factors suggestive of an underlying positive lymph node biopsy (providing diagnostic clues) and lymphoma were analyzed. Results: The etiologies were as follows: infectious disease in 10 (4.1%) cases, connective tissue diseases in 51 (21.1%) cases, neoplastic diseases in 57 (23.6%) cases, other diseases in 28 (11.6%) cases, and unknown diagnosis in 96 (39.7%) cases. A total of 88 patients (36.4%) were diagnosed through lymph node biopsy. The following four independent risk factors were found to be related to positive lymph node biopsy: male gender (OR 2.471; 95% CI 1.158–5.270; p = 0.019), no rash (OR 3.531; 95% CI 1.595–7.816; p = 0.002), shape index of the lymph node (OR 8.566; 95% CI 1.035–70.915; p = 0.046), and hypoalbuminemia (OR 3.370; 95% CI 1.470–7.728; p = 0.004). Later, 146 patients with a confirmed diagnosis (including 57 cases of lymphoma and 89 cases of non-lymphoma) were included in the analysis of lymphoma-related factors. Age older than 45 years (OR 8.663; 95% CI 3.045–24.647; p < 0.001), no rash (OR 4.946; 95% CI 1.646–14.859; p = 0.004), serositis (OR 3.588; 95% CI 1.137–11.318; p = 0.029), abnormal blood flow of the lymph node (OR 3.025; 95% CI 1.034–8.848; p = 0.043), abnormal central lymph nodes (OR 6.546; 95% CI 1.721–24.898; p = 0.006), focal lesions in the spleen (OR 13.386; 95% CI 2.067–86.706; p = 0.006), and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > 250 U/L (OR 3.885; 95% CI 1.111–13.584; p = 0.034) were independent risk factors for lymphoma. Conclusions: Lymph node biopsy is a valuable diagnostic procedure for patients with FUO and lymphadenopathy. For male patients without rash, more rounded lymph nodes, and hypoalbuminemia, we strongly recommend lymph node biopsy. Age older than 45 years, no rash, serositis, abnormal blood flow of the lymph node, abnormal central lymph nodes, focal lesions in the spleen, and serum LDH > 250 U/L are risk factors suggesting an underlying lymphoma, and multi-site biopsy should be considered if necessary.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(10)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Hematological disorders and diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.