Australian perspectives towards genomics informed risk-based cancer screening programs: a focus group study

BACKGROUND: Predictions of cancer risk based on genomic data (polygenic risk scores) can stratify a population into different risk groups, allowing risk-tailored cancer screening programs. While such approaches are generally viewed as acceptable, there remain gaps in understanding Australian perceptions to guide implementation of future cancer control programs and policies. This project aimed to explore Australians' views on using genomic information to tailor cancer screening and how such programs could be implemented. METHODS: Four focus groups (n = 28) were held using a discussion guide that explored key features at each stage of potential programs: deciding to take the test, completing the test, receiving the results, and the subsequent impact on screening. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify, code and report themes. RESULTS: Three central themes emerged: (1) The value of knowing, which reflected motivations to test for personal as well as family and social benefits; (2) Navigating the complexity of genomics, highlighting challenges in understanding potential pre-test information and results; and (3) Trust in testing, providers, and government which influenced program acceptability for the initial genomic testing. However, this trust may not always result in participants following subsequent cancer screening recommendations. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies the need for community education and clear communication about genomics-informed risk-tailored cancer screening. Potential screening programs should consider the role of healthcare professionals and ensure they receive appropriate training to meet public needs. Further research should explore potential adherence to risk-tailored screening recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Genetics
Published
2026-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00971-y
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Australian perspectives towards genomics informed risk-based cancer screening programs: a focus group study

Karen Canfell, Amber Salisbury, Anne Elizabeth Cust, Louisa G. Collins et al.
2 links
Journal of Community Genetics
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Australian perspectives towards genomics informed risk-based cancer screening programs: a focus group study

Karen Canfell, Amber Salisbury, Anne Elizabeth Cust, Louisa G. Collins, Amelia K. Smit, Cynthia Low, Alison M. Pearce, Julia Steinberg, Michael Caruana, Richard Norman, Renee Mostyn, Deborah Di-Xin Zhou, Kate Dunlop
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Predictions of cancer risk based on genomic data (polygenic risk scores) can stratify a population into different risk groups, allowing risk-tailored cancer screening programs. While such approaches are generally viewed as acceptable, there remain gaps in understanding Australian perceptions to guide implementation of future cancer control programs and policies. This project aimed to explore Australians' views on using genomic information to tailor cancer screening and how such programs could be implemented. METHODS: Four focus groups (n = 28) were held using a discussion guide that explored key features at each stage of potential programs: deciding to take the test, completing the test, receiving the results, and the subsequent impact on screening. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify, code and report themes. RESULTS: Three central themes emerged: (1) The value of knowing, which reflected motivations to test for personal as well as family and social benefits; (2) Navigating the complexity of genomics, highlighting challenges in understanding potential pre-test information and results; and (3) Trust in testing, providers, and government which influenced program acceptability for the initial genomic testing. However, this trust may not always result in participants following subsequent cancer screening recommendations. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies the need for community education and clear communication about genomics-informed risk-tailored cancer screening. Potential screening programs should consider the role of healthcare professionals and ensure they receive appropriate training to meet public needs. Further research should explore potential adherence to risk-tailored screening recommendations.

Journal of Community GeneticsVol. 17(6)
The University of Sydney (AU), Cancer Council Queensland (AU), Curtin University (AU), QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU), Melanoma Institute Australia (AU), Cancer Council NSW (AU)
Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon