N₀, N₁, and the Structural Origin of Freedom, Evil, Religion, and Artificial Intelligence

This paper presents a structural interpretation of free will, morality, religion, institutional continuity, and artificial intelligence through the framework of the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA). The central thesis posits that local observable dynamics ($N_0$) are inherently insufficient to derive the conditions of global selection, legitimacy, and realization ($N_1$), leading to a fundamental multiplicity of admissible trajectories within realizable systems. The author reframes good and evil as distinctions between structurally coherent and destructive trajectories, and interprets suffering as an unavoidable consequence of selection under incomplete local closure. Furthermore, the paper analyzes historical Christianity and apostolic succession as mechanisms for preserving non-local continuity. Finally, it distinguishes human agency from artificial intelligence by arguing that while AI optimizes within predefined state spaces, human consciousness is capable of partially redefining the state space itself.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20174283
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

N₀, N₁, and the Structural Origin of Freedom, Evil, Religion, and Artificial Intelligence

Claudio Bresciano
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

N₀, N₁, and the Structural Origin of Freedom, Evil, Religion, and Artificial Intelligence

Claudio Bresciano
article en

Abstract

This paper presents a structural interpretation of free will, morality, religion, institutional continuity, and artificial intelligence through the framework of the Theory of Axiomatic Necessity (TNA). The central thesis posits that local observable dynamics ($N_0$) are inherently insufficient to derive the conditions of global selection, legitimacy, and realization ($N_1$), leading to a fundamental multiplicity of admissible trajectories within realizable systems. The author reframes good and evil as distinctions between structurally coherent and destructive trajectories, and interprets suffering as an unavoidable consequence of selection under incomplete local closure. Furthermore, the paper analyzes historical Christianity and apostolic succession as mechanisms for preserving non-local continuity. Finally, it distinguishes human agency from artificial intelligence by arguing that while AI optimizes within predefined state spaces, human consciousness is capable of partially redefining the state space itself.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.