Influence of Impact Location and Incident Angle on Thoracic Injury Risk from Kinetic Impact Projectiles

Abstract Kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs) are widely utilized in law enforcement as a non-lethal means for crowd control, yet they remain capable of causing severe or fatal injuries. This study utilizes the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) finite element model to evaluate thoracic injury risk across various impact locations and incident angles for two types of KIPs: the Flash-Ball and the 40 mm Sponge Round. The Viscous Criterion (VCmax) was used to assess the injury risk with a threshold of 0.8 m/s representing a 50% probability of sustaining a thoracic injury of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2 or 3. Simulations demonstrated that impact location and incident angle influence injury severity, with near-perpendicular impacts yielding the highest VCmax values. Results indicated that due to its more concentrated frontal profile, the Sponge Round projectile transfers approximately 77% of its initial kinetic energy to the body, whereas the Flash-Ball projectile distributes force more widely, transferring 60% of its initial kinetic energy. Critically, both projectiles approached or exceeded the 0.8 m/s injury threshold at recommended minimum firing distances, particularly when impacting regions directly over the heart and lungs. The Sponge Round projectile, in particular, presented up to an 80% probability of AIS 2-3 injury under standard operational conditions. These findings suggest that current KIP designs and thoracic targeting protocols pose a substantial risk of severe injury, highlighting the urgent need for safer projectile designs and improved training to minimize unintended fatalities during deployment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4071933
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of Impact Location and Incident Angle on Thoracic Injury Risk from Kinetic Impact Projectiles

Arafat Anzir, Karim H. Muci-Küchler
Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Influence of Impact Location and Incident Angle on Thoracic Injury Risk from Kinetic Impact Projectiles

Arafat Anzir, Karim H. Muci-Küchler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Kinetic impact projectiles (KIPs) are widely utilized in law enforcement as a non-lethal means for crowd control, yet they remain capable of causing severe or fatal injuries. This study utilizes the Total Human Model for Safety (THUMS) finite element model to evaluate thoracic injury risk across various impact locations and incident angles for two types of KIPs: the Flash-Ball and the 40 mm Sponge Round. The Viscous Criterion (VCmax) was used to assess the injury risk with a threshold of 0.8 m/s representing a 50% probability of sustaining a thoracic injury of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2 or 3. Simulations demonstrated that impact location and incident angle influence injury severity, with near-perpendicular impacts yielding the highest VCmax values. Results indicated that due to its more concentrated frontal profile, the Sponge Round projectile transfers approximately 77% of its initial kinetic energy to the body, whereas the Flash-Ball projectile distributes force more widely, transferring 60% of its initial kinetic energy. Critically, both projectiles approached or exceeded the 0.8 m/s injury threshold at recommended minimum firing distances, particularly when impacting regions directly over the heart and lungs. The Sponge Round projectile, in particular, presented up to an 80% probability of AIS 2-3 injury under standard operational conditions. These findings suggest that current KIP designs and thoracic targeting protocols pose a substantial risk of severe injury, highlighting the urgent need for safer projectile designs and improved training to minimize unintended fatalities during deployment.

Journal of Engineering and Science in Medical Diagnostics and Therapy
Texas State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.