From Data to Physics: Physics-Informed Machine Learning Frameworks in Interdisciplinary Applications

Computational modeling and machine learning have impacted several different areas of science and accelerated advancements in multiple venues. Yet traditional machine learning models have many well-known drawbacks: besides demanding a significant amount of data, they may fail to generalize beyond training data, are often treated as “black boxes”, and may predict physically inconsistent results. In response to these limitations, Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) has emerged as a new area that integrates domain knowledge, such as energy or mass conservation, directly into data-driven algorithms. This review paper examines the foundations and main strategies of PIML, organizing the approaches into three categories: automated discovery and system identification, continuous-time modeling, and operator learning. In addition, Physics-Informed Neural Networks are analyzed in a dedicated section that covers architecture fundamentals, forward and inverse problem formulations, loss function design and implementation challenges. The paper also presents a survey of interdisciplinary applications of PIML in materials science, biomedical engineering, and fractional calculus. In this context, the review also analyzes open challenges and outlines future directions in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dynamics
Published
2026-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics6020016
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Data to Physics: Physics-Informed Machine Learning Frameworks in Interdisciplinary Applications

Sergio A. David, Carlos A. Valentim
Dynamics
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

From Data to Physics: Physics-Informed Machine Learning Frameworks in Interdisciplinary Applications

Sergio A. David, Carlos A. Valentim
article en

Abstract

Computational modeling and machine learning have impacted several different areas of science and accelerated advancements in multiple venues. Yet traditional machine learning models have many well-known drawbacks: besides demanding a significant amount of data, they may fail to generalize beyond training data, are often treated as “black boxes”, and may predict physically inconsistent results. In response to these limitations, Physics-Informed Machine Learning (PIML) has emerged as a new area that integrates domain knowledge, such as energy or mass conservation, directly into data-driven algorithms. This review paper examines the foundations and main strategies of PIML, organizing the approaches into three categories: automated discovery and system identification, continuous-time modeling, and operator learning. In addition, Physics-Informed Neural Networks are analyzed in a dedicated section that covers architecture fundamentals, forward and inverse problem formulations, loss function design and implementation challenges. The paper also presents a survey of interdisciplinary applications of PIML in materials science, biomedical engineering, and fractional calculus. In this context, the review also analyzes open challenges and outlines future directions in the field.

DynamicsVol. 6(2)
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.