Trajectory-Identity Theory: Retrospective Certification, Interruption, and the Postmortem Standpoint
This paper develops the epistemological foundation of Trajectory-Identity Theory. It begins from the claim that human recognition is structurally delayed: what appears as present experience is already past when it becomes available to consciousness. From this, the paper argues that recognition does not face the future. Future oriented mental activity remains possible, but it belongs to predictive imagination constructed from past regularities rather than to recognition itself. Life, therefore, is not possessed in the present. It is retrospectively certified as a sequence resumed after repeated interruptions, such as sleep, anesthesia, and loss of consciousness. The subject is not a present owner of life, but a trajectory that becomes readable through retrospective assumption. The postmortem standpoint is defined not as belief in an afterlife, but as the structural position from which a life is read as an already recorded trajectory. On this basis, death may be reread as the most conspicuous interruption, while duplication and immortality expand assumptive or signature responsibility rather than dilute it. Freedom is consequently relocated from future choice to retrospective interpretation. It is not the power to choose an undetermined future, nor the power to change a determined past, but the strength to read that past as one's own trajectory. Responsibility is the demand that this trajectory remain readable without concealment, falsification, or evasion.
Publication Details
- Journal
- Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
- Published
- 2026-05-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.17613/03sba-b0b30
- Primary Topic
- Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00