A periodic oscillatory parametrisation of H(z): fits to DESI DR1 and DR2, comparison with w0waCDM, and mock-catalogue validation

We present the Concentric Orbital Cosmological Model (COCM), an extension of LCDM in which the observable universe is a ring R_n in Keplerian orbit around a cosmological focus C_0, interpreted as a dynamic p-brane in a higher-dimensional bulk. The orbit imprints a periodic multiplicative modulation on the expansion rate H(z). We fit this model to H(z) data from DESI DR1+BAO (n=24) and DESI DR2+BAO (n=14) combined with cosmic chronometers, and compare it directly against w0waCDM. Key results: (1) COCM improves over LCDM with Delta_chi2=10.1 (p=0.018) in DR1 and Delta_chi2=194.6 in DR2.(2) COCM outperforms w0waCDM by Delta_chi2=87.7.(3) COCM+w0wa improves over w0wa alone by Delta_chi2=126.1 (p<0.0001): the two signals are statistically independent.(4) Bootstrap significance rises from 1.2-sigma (DR1) to 1.7-sigma (DR2).(5) MCMC analysis gives A0=0.177+/-0.019 in COCM+w0wa at 9.4-sigma (68% CI: [0.158, 0.193]).(6) The modulation naturally accounts for ~87% of the Hubble tension (4.86 of 5.6 km/s/Mpc) without additional free parameters. This is the fifth paper in the COCM research programme. Related works:P1: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19950582P2: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19991607P3: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20090596P4: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20096465NT: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20104113 v4 (May 2026): Complete revision. Added mock catalogue test (N=300, p<0.0033), residuals comparison figure, zero-mean parametrisation correction, structured limitations section, explicit confirmation/falsification criteria for DESI DR3 and Euclid DR1. Survey timelines updated to May 2026. Final editorial pass. Scientific results unchanged. v5 (May 2026): Bayesian evidence via nested sampling (Appendix A, ΔlogZ=0.4 consistent with p=0.049). CMB perturbative compatibility demonstrated numerically (Δl<0.1, 1943 cycles). Added citations: Skilling 2004, Speagle 2020, Kass-Raftery 1995, Calderon et al. 2025, Planck 2020. Editorial compression. All scientific conclusions unchanged.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20171261
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A periodic oscillatory parametrisation of H(z): fits to DESI DR1 and DR2, comparison with w0waCDM, and mock-catalogue validation

José Luis Vázquez González
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
preprint

A periodic oscillatory parametrisation of H(z): fits to DESI DR1 and DR2, comparison with w0waCDM, and mock-catalogue validation

José Luis Vázquez González
preprint en

Abstract

We present the Concentric Orbital Cosmological Model (COCM), an extension of LCDM in which the observable universe is a ring R_n in Keplerian orbit around a cosmological focus C_0, interpreted as a dynamic p-brane in a higher-dimensional bulk. The orbit imprints a periodic multiplicative modulation on the expansion rate H(z). We fit this model to H(z) data from DESI DR1+BAO (n=24) and DESI DR2+BAO (n=14) combined with cosmic chronometers, and compare it directly against w0waCDM. Key results: (1) COCM improves over LCDM with Delta_chi2=10.1 (p=0.018) in DR1 and Delta_chi2=194.6 in DR2.(2) COCM outperforms w0waCDM by Delta_chi2=87.7.(3) COCM+w0wa improves over w0wa alone by Delta_chi2=126.1 (p<0.0001): the two signals are statistically independent.(4) Bootstrap significance rises from 1.2-sigma (DR1) to 1.7-sigma (DR2).(5) MCMC analysis gives A0=0.177+/-0.019 in COCM+w0wa at 9.4-sigma (68% CI: [0.158, 0.193]).(6) The modulation naturally accounts for ~87% of the Hubble tension (4.86 of 5.6 km/s/Mpc) without additional free parameters. This is the fifth paper in the COCM research programme. Related works:P1: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19950582P2: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19991607P3: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20090596P4: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20096465NT: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20104113 v4 (May 2026): Complete revision. Added mock catalogue test (N=300, p<0.0033), residuals comparison figure, zero-mean parametrisation correction, structured limitations section, explicit confirmation/falsification criteria for DESI DR3 and Euclid DR1. Survey timelines updated to May 2026. Final editorial pass. Scientific results unchanged. v5 (May 2026): Bayesian evidence via nested sampling (Appendix A, ΔlogZ=0.4 consistent with p=0.049). CMB perturbative compatibility demonstrated numerically (Δl<0.1, 1943 cycles). Added citations: Skilling 2004, Speagle 2020, Kass-Raftery 1995, Calderon et al. 2025, Planck 2020. Editorial compression. All scientific conclusions unchanged.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.