Plant‐based restoration practices in South American agroecosystems: progress, challenges, and research gaps

Abstract Introduction The expansion of agroecosystems at the expense of native ecosystems is a major driver of environmental change, increasing food production while eroding biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). In South America, where nearly one third of land is under productive use, reconciling production with ecological restoration is a central challenge. Objectives We reviewed plant‐based restoration practices in South American agroecosystems to assess (1) which types of agroecosystems are most frequently associated with restoration practices, (2) which restoration practices are most commonly implemented, and (3) which indicators are used to assess restoration outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic review of 168 studies, extracting information on agroecosystem types, restoration practices, and indicators for restoration outcomes. Results Restoration studies were geographically concentrated in Brazil, and secondly in Colombia, Argentina, and Ecuador, focused mainly on pastures and croplands. Assisted recovery based on tree planting with native woody species was the most frequently reported practice. Most studies assessed different types of outcome indicators; plants were the most commonly evaluated biodiversity group, and soil quality regulation was the most frequently measured ES. Conclusions Restoration practices in South American agroecosystems follow a continuum of interventions shaped by ecological constraints and production demands. Our synthesis highlights geographic, taxonomic, and indicator‐related gaps, and underscores the need for integrated monitoring frameworks to support restoration planning and implementation in productive landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Restoration Ecology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70427
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plant‐based restoration practices in South American agroecosystems: progress, challenges, and research gaps

Martín Videla, Georgina Conti, Ezequiel González, Esteban Kowaljow et al.
Restoration Ecology
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Plant‐based restoration practices in South American agroecosystems: progress, challenges, and research gaps

Martín Videla, Georgina Conti, Ezequiel González, Esteban Kowaljow, Malena Villarruel-Parma, Juan I. Whitworth-Hulse, Ana Valentina Revol, Alejandra B. Dip, Paula Foradori, Belén Longoni, Victoria Carballo, Betania Naldini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The expansion of agroecosystems at the expense of native ecosystems is a major driver of environmental change, increasing food production while eroding biodiversity and ecosystem services (ES). In South America, where nearly one third of land is under productive use, reconciling production with ecological restoration is a central challenge. Objectives We reviewed plant‐based restoration practices in South American agroecosystems to assess (1) which types of agroecosystems are most frequently associated with restoration practices, (2) which restoration practices are most commonly implemented, and (3) which indicators are used to assess restoration outcomes. Methods We conducted a systematic review of 168 studies, extracting information on agroecosystem types, restoration practices, and indicators for restoration outcomes. Results Restoration studies were geographically concentrated in Brazil, and secondly in Colombia, Argentina, and Ecuador, focused mainly on pastures and croplands. Assisted recovery based on tree planting with native woody species was the most frequently reported practice. Most studies assessed different types of outcome indicators; plants were the most commonly evaluated biodiversity group, and soil quality regulation was the most frequently measured ES. Conclusions Restoration practices in South American agroecosystems follow a continuum of interventions shaped by ecological constraints and production demands. Our synthesis highlights geographic, taxonomic, and indicator‐related gaps, and underscores the need for integrated monitoring frameworks to support restoration planning and implementation in productive landscapes.

Restoration Ecology
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba (AR), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Luis (AR), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán (AR), Fundación para la Investigación, Docencia y Prevención del Cáncer (AR), Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal (AR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.