Extensive but fragmented evidence limits understanding of factors shaping farmers' decisions regarding diversified farming systems: A global evidence map

Abstract Diversified farming systems are increasingly recognised for their potential to enhance the sustainability and resilience of food systems. Yet it remains unclear whether empirical research adequately captures the drivers and constraints shaping farmers' decisions regarding diversified farming systems across stages of decision‐making, influencing factors, practices and contexts. We present a systematic evidence map of 354 regression models from 193 peer‐reviewed studies (1982–2023) examining how multiple factors relate to five decision‐making stages (awareness, interest, adoption, intensity of adoption and dis‐adoption) across 10 diversified farming practices in 45 countries. Factors were classified into 14 categories spanning biophysical, socio‐economic, psychological, institutional and contextual dimensions. To identify geographic gaps, we compared the spatial distribution of decision‐making research with country and subregional suitability for profitable diversified farming systems. The literature overwhelmingly focuses on the adoption stage (82% of studies), with limited evidence on factors influencing farmers' awareness of, interest in or dis‐adoption of diversified practices. Coverage is uneven across practices, factors and regions. Agroforestry dominates the literature (39% of studies), while crop–animal integrated practices are rarely assessed. Models most often include human (95%), natural (77%) and financial capital (71%), with limited representation of political and institutional conditions and psychological factors (e.g. perceptions and social norms). Among the 70 countries with very high suitability for profitable diversification, only 17 (24%) are represented, with particularly limited evidence in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean. While the literature provides robust evidence on factors influencing adoption, gaps across other decision‐making stages, institutional and psychological dimensions, complex practices and high‐suitability regions constrain its relevance for policy and investment. More holistic, theory‐informed research capturing decision‐making across stages and contexts is needed to support the implementation and long‐term viability of diversified farming systems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.70334
Primary Topic
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Extensive but fragmented evidence limits understanding of factors shaping farmers' decisions regarding diversified farming systems: A global evidence map

Natalia Estrada-Carmona, Sarah K. Jones, Bruno Rapidel, Cécile Chéron‐Bessou et al.
People and Nature
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
article

Extensive but fragmented evidence limits understanding of factors shaping farmers' decisions regarding diversified farming systems: A global evidence map

Natalia Estrada-Carmona, Sarah K. Jones, Bruno Rapidel, Cécile Chéron‐Bessou, Damien Beillouin, Andrea C. Sánchez Bogado
article en

Abstract

Abstract Diversified farming systems are increasingly recognised for their potential to enhance the sustainability and resilience of food systems. Yet it remains unclear whether empirical research adequately captures the drivers and constraints shaping farmers' decisions regarding diversified farming systems across stages of decision‐making, influencing factors, practices and contexts. We present a systematic evidence map of 354 regression models from 193 peer‐reviewed studies (1982–2023) examining how multiple factors relate to five decision‐making stages (awareness, interest, adoption, intensity of adoption and dis‐adoption) across 10 diversified farming practices in 45 countries. Factors were classified into 14 categories spanning biophysical, socio‐economic, psychological, institutional and contextual dimensions. To identify geographic gaps, we compared the spatial distribution of decision‐making research with country and subregional suitability for profitable diversified farming systems. The literature overwhelmingly focuses on the adoption stage (82% of studies), with limited evidence on factors influencing farmers' awareness of, interest in or dis‐adoption of diversified practices. Coverage is uneven across practices, factors and regions. Agroforestry dominates the literature (39% of studies), while crop–animal integrated practices are rarely assessed. Models most often include human (95%), natural (77%) and financial capital (71%), with limited representation of political and institutional conditions and psychological factors (e.g. perceptions and social norms). Among the 70 countries with very high suitability for profitable diversification, only 17 (24%) are represented, with particularly limited evidence in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean. While the literature provides robust evidence on factors influencing adoption, gaps across other decision‐making stages, institutional and psychological dimensions, complex practices and high‐suitability regions constrain its relevance for policy and investment. More holistic, theory‐informed research capturing decision‐making across stages and contexts is needed to support the implementation and long‐term viability of diversified farming systems. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and Nature
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Alliance Bioversity International - CIAT (IT), Université de Montpellier (FR), Institut Agro Montpellier (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (FR), Bioversity International (CO), Forests and Societies (FR), Institut Agro Montpelier (FR), Centre International deHautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes (FR), ABSys
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Agricultural Innovations and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.