Impella 5.5 support in severe cardiogenic shock: outcomes from the first spanish multicentre cohort in heart transplant centres

Abstract OBJECTIVES Impella 5.5 is an established temporary mechanical circulatory support device for severe cardiogenic shock. Spain, characterised by high heart transplant activity and increasing use of controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD), provides a relevant setting to evaluate its use and outcomes. We aimed to describe clinical characteristics, trajectories, and outcomes of Impella 5.5 support in the first Spanish multicentre cohort from heart transplant centres. METHODS Retrospective multicentre observational study including consecutive patients supported with Impella 5.5 in hospitals with active heart transplant programmes. Baseline characteristics, INTERMACS profile, additional support, complications, support duration, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. Outcomes were analysed across INTERMACS profiles. RESULTS Ninety-three patients were included (33 INTERMACS 1, 37 INTERMACS 2, 23 INTERMACS 3). Additional support was required in 46%, mainly VA-ECLS. Device-related complications were reported as event frequencies. The predominant clinical trajectory was heart transplantation (68.8%), contrasting with international series in which long-term mechanical support and transplantation are more evenly distributed. In-hospital mortality was 43%, with a clear gradient across INTERMACS profiles 1–3 (60.6%, 37.8%, and 26.1%, respectively; p = 0.013). Mean support duration was 16 days, and more than one-third of transplants were from controlled DCD donors. CONCLUSIONS Impella 5.5 was used as temporary mechanical circulatory support in severe cardiogenic shock and was predominantly associated with heart transplantation in a transplant-oriented healthcare system. Outcomes were closely associated with INTERMACS profile, reflecting differences in baseline severity and patient selection. Comparisons with international registries are descriptive only.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag137
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impella 5.5 support in severe cardiogenic shock: outcomes from the first spanish multicentre cohort in heart transplant centres

José Manuel Martínez‐Comendador, Stefano Urso, Lucía García Alcalde, Elio Martín Gutiérrez et al.
Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Impella 5.5 support in severe cardiogenic shock: outcomes from the first spanish multicentre cohort in heart transplant centres

José Manuel Martínez‐Comendador, Stefano Urso, Lucía García Alcalde, Elio Martín Gutiérrez, Christian Muñoz Guijosa, Gregorio Rábago Juan Aracil, Daniel Ortiz Berbel, Manuel Pérez-Guillén, José J. Cuenca Castillo, Álvaro Pedraz Prieto, Carlos Esteban Martín López
article en

Abstract

Abstract OBJECTIVES Impella 5.5 is an established temporary mechanical circulatory support device for severe cardiogenic shock. Spain, characterised by high heart transplant activity and increasing use of controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD), provides a relevant setting to evaluate its use and outcomes. We aimed to describe clinical characteristics, trajectories, and outcomes of Impella 5.5 support in the first Spanish multicentre cohort from heart transplant centres. METHODS Retrospective multicentre observational study including consecutive patients supported with Impella 5.5 in hospitals with active heart transplant programmes. Baseline characteristics, INTERMACS profile, additional support, complications, support duration, and in-hospital mortality were recorded. Outcomes were analysed across INTERMACS profiles. RESULTS Ninety-three patients were included (33 INTERMACS 1, 37 INTERMACS 2, 23 INTERMACS 3). Additional support was required in 46%, mainly VA-ECLS. Device-related complications were reported as event frequencies. The predominant clinical trajectory was heart transplantation (68.8%), contrasting with international series in which long-term mechanical support and transplantation are more evenly distributed. In-hospital mortality was 43%, with a clear gradient across INTERMACS profiles 1–3 (60.6%, 37.8%, and 26.1%, respectively; p = 0.013). Mean support duration was 16 days, and more than one-third of transplants were from controlled DCD donors. CONCLUSIONS Impella 5.5 was used as temporary mechanical circulatory support in severe cardiogenic shock and was predominantly associated with heart transplantation in a transplant-oriented healthcare system. Outcomes were closely associated with INTERMACS profile, reflecting differences in baseline severity and patient selection. Comparisons with international registries are descriptive only.

Interdisciplinary CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery
Bellvitge University Hospital (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES), Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín (ES), Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital (ES), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (ES), Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.