Quality of Autism Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence Tools: Implications for Paediatric Care

AIM: Families increasingly turn to artificial intelligence (AI) tools for information about autism spectrum disorder (ASD), often during early childhood when concerns about development, diagnosis and intervention first emerge. From a paediatric perspective, these tools increasingly function as informal sources of health information alongside primary care and developmental services. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of autism-related information generated by widely used AI platforms. METHODS: Using a descriptive research design, responses generated by six freely accessible AI platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, Brave and Grok) were examined. Each platform was asked 15 autism questions with well-established scientific answers. Responses were evaluated across five dimensions relevant to paediatric health communication: accuracy, readability, language framing, actionability and reference quality. RESULTS: Substantial variability was observed across AI platforms. Several tools produced generally accurate explanations of ASD; however, readability levels consistently exceeded recommended guidelines for paediatric health materials (i.e., the 6th-8th grade reading level). Most responses relied primarily on medicalized language rather than neurodiversity-affirming framing. Actionable guidance was limited, with only a minority of responses offering concrete next steps for families navigating early paediatric decision-making. Reference practices varied widely, with some platforms providing numerous credible sources and others offering few or none. CONCLUSIONS: Although AI tools can support parental understanding of ASD, differences in clarity, tone, usability and transparency may shape families' expectations prior to or during paediatric consultations. These findings highlight the need for thoughtful use of AI-generated autism information and suggest that families may benefit from guidance from paediatric professionals when interpreting AI-based responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.70433
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Autism Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence Tools: Implications for Paediatric Care

Şerife Balıkcı
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
article

Quality of Autism Information Generated by Artificial Intelligence Tools: Implications for Paediatric Care

Şerife Balıkcı
article en

Abstract

AIM: Families increasingly turn to artificial intelligence (AI) tools for information about autism spectrum disorder (ASD), often during early childhood when concerns about development, diagnosis and intervention first emerge. From a paediatric perspective, these tools increasingly function as informal sources of health information alongside primary care and developmental services. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of autism-related information generated by widely used AI platforms. METHODS: Using a descriptive research design, responses generated by six freely accessible AI platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Microsoft Copilot, Perplexity, Brave and Grok) were examined. Each platform was asked 15 autism questions with well-established scientific answers. Responses were evaluated across five dimensions relevant to paediatric health communication: accuracy, readability, language framing, actionability and reference quality. RESULTS: Substantial variability was observed across AI platforms. Several tools produced generally accurate explanations of ASD; however, readability levels consistently exceeded recommended guidelines for paediatric health materials (i.e., the 6th-8th grade reading level). Most responses relied primarily on medicalized language rather than neurodiversity-affirming framing. Actionable guidance was limited, with only a minority of responses offering concrete next steps for families navigating early paediatric decision-making. Reference practices varied widely, with some platforms providing numerous credible sources and others offering few or none. CONCLUSIONS: Although AI tools can support parental understanding of ASD, differences in clarity, tone, usability and transparency may shape families' expectations prior to or during paediatric consultations. These findings highlight the need for thoughtful use of AI-generated autism information and suggest that families may benefit from guidance from paediatric professionals when interpreting AI-based responses.

Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Piedmont Community College (US), Samsun University (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.