Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS-O (vE3SM3.0.0) – Part 1: Idealized experiments

Abstract. Rapid advances in computational power over the past decade have enabled global, kilometer-scale simulations that realistically represent open-ocean submesoscale dynamics. However, the ability of global ocean models to represent coastal submesoscale dynamics—where flows are more heterogeneous and strongly shaped by coastlines, bathymetry, and buoyancy inputs—remains largely unexplored. This study is the first of two companion papers assessing coastal submesoscale processes in MPAS-O, an unstructured global ocean model. Here, we present the first idealized evaluation of MPAS-O’s representation of coastal submesoscale dynamics using observed conditions in the Mississippi–Atchafalaya (M-A) River plume as a template for initial conditions, and with the previously validated structured-grid regional model ROMS serving as a benchmark. We compare statistical metrics based on flow invariants—total strain, relative vorticity, and divergence—as well as velocity gradients in frontal coordinates, across horizontal resolutions ranging from 10 km to 100 m within an idealized model domain. We find that the representation of submesoscale baroclinic instabilities is highly similar across all resolutions such that the impact of model choice is smaller than the choice of spatial grid resolution. We also compare numerical and physical mixing between models using online diagnostics based on discrete variance decay. We find that ROMS generally has more numerical mixing and less physical mixing than MPAS-O across all resolutions. Trends in numerical mixing likely arise from MPAS-O's flux-corrected transport tracer advection scheme, which is shown to be anti-diffusive relative to the MPDATA scheme used in the ROMS simulations. Trends in physical mixing likely arise from differences in each model’s configuration of the vertical mixing scheme (the K-Profile Parameterization). A companion paper extends this idealized model-model comparison to realistic simulations of the M-A River plume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscientific model development
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-10321-2026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS-O (vE3SM3.0.0) – Part 1: Idealized experiments

Dylan Schlichting, Darren Engwirda, Katherine Smith, Kyle E. Hinson et al.
1 citations
Geoscientific model development
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
3.48
article

Towards high-fidelity simulations of coastal submesoscale baroclinic instabilities with MPAS-O (vE3SM3.0.0) – Part 1: Idealized experiments

Dylan Schlichting, Darren Engwirda, Katherine Smith, Kyle E. Hinson, Robert D. Hetland, Kaila Uyeda, Mark R. Petersen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Rapid advances in computational power over the past decade have enabled global, kilometer-scale simulations that realistically represent open-ocean submesoscale dynamics. However, the ability of global ocean models to represent coastal submesoscale dynamics—where flows are more heterogeneous and strongly shaped by coastlines, bathymetry, and buoyancy inputs—remains largely unexplored. This study is the first of two companion papers assessing coastal submesoscale processes in MPAS-O, an unstructured global ocean model. Here, we present the first idealized evaluation of MPAS-O’s representation of coastal submesoscale dynamics using observed conditions in the Mississippi–Atchafalaya (M-A) River plume as a template for initial conditions, and with the previously validated structured-grid regional model ROMS serving as a benchmark. We compare statistical metrics based on flow invariants—total strain, relative vorticity, and divergence—as well as velocity gradients in frontal coordinates, across horizontal resolutions ranging from 10 km to 100 m within an idealized model domain. We find that the representation of submesoscale baroclinic instabilities is highly similar across all resolutions such that the impact of model choice is smaller than the choice of spatial grid resolution. We also compare numerical and physical mixing between models using online diagnostics based on discrete variance decay. We find that ROMS generally has more numerical mixing and less physical mixing than MPAS-O across all resolutions. Trends in numerical mixing likely arise from MPAS-O's flux-corrected transport tracer advection scheme, which is shown to be anti-diffusive relative to the MPDATA scheme used in the ROMS simulations. Trends in physical mixing likely arise from differences in each model’s configuration of the vertical mixing scheme (the K-Profile Parameterization). A companion paper extends this idealized model-model comparison to realistic simulations of the M-A River plume.

Geoscientific model developmentVol. 19(21)
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), University of California, Irvine (US)
Office of Science
Life below water, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
3.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon