Validation of PREFIRE mid- and far-infrared radiances during the WHAFFFERS campaign

Despite containing up to half of the Earth's thermal emission to space, the far-infrared spectral region (FIR, defined here as 100–667 cm −1 or 15–100 µm) has seldom been observed from satellites. This has contributed to substantial uncertainties in the spectroscopy of water vapour, radiative properties of clouds, and surface spectral emissivity; these in turn limit confidence in modelled FIR energy flows. With the advent of the Polar Radiant Energy in the Far-InfraRed Experiment (PREFIRE), a step is taken towards new, systematic, spectral observations of the Earth in the FIR. Launched in 2024, the two PREFIRE CubeSats offer a new perspective of Earth's outgoing longwave energy with moderate spectral resolution. However, the observational uncertainty budget requires further consolidation. In this study we assess the accuracy of PREFIRE spectral measurements through a “ground-to-space” closure experiment. Using zenith-viewing observations from the ground-based Far INfrarEd Spectrometer for Surface Emissivity (FINESSE) recorded during the WHAFFFERS campaign, we constrain atmospheric data taken from in situ sensors. With this optimised profile data we simulate PREFIRE-observed radiances for an overflight of our field site in eastern Canada. Simulations of the FINESSE radiances are in very good agreement with observations, while those from PREFIRE indicate some bias beyond the calculated uncertainties. We find that atmospheric water vapour specification, uncertain surface properties, and instrument noise dominate the uncertainties. Based on these findings, we highlight proposed techniques for closure experiments using terrestrial and satellite instruments alike. Such experiments will provide a ground-truth for validation of future FIR satellite missions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-7183-2026
Primary Topic
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Validation of PREFIRE mid- and far-infrared radiances during the WHAFFFERS campaign

Helen Brindley, Tristan L’Ecuyer, Sophie Mosselmans, Laura Warwick et al.
3 links
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
article

Validation of PREFIRE mid- and far-infrared radiances during the WHAFFFERS campaign

Helen Brindley, Tristan L’Ecuyer, Sophie Mosselmans, Laura Warwick, Dirk Schuettemeyer, Sanjeevani Panditharatne, Robin James Hogan, H. Oetjen, Benjamin Riot-Bretêcher, Benedict Pery, Yi Huang, Jonathan Murray
article en

Abstract

Despite containing up to half of the Earth's thermal emission to space, the far-infrared spectral region (FIR, defined here as 100–667 cm −1 or 15–100 µm) has seldom been observed from satellites. This has contributed to substantial uncertainties in the spectroscopy of water vapour, radiative properties of clouds, and surface spectral emissivity; these in turn limit confidence in modelled FIR energy flows. With the advent of the Polar Radiant Energy in the Far-InfraRed Experiment (PREFIRE), a step is taken towards new, systematic, spectral observations of the Earth in the FIR. Launched in 2024, the two PREFIRE CubeSats offer a new perspective of Earth's outgoing longwave energy with moderate spectral resolution. However, the observational uncertainty budget requires further consolidation. In this study we assess the accuracy of PREFIRE spectral measurements through a “ground-to-space” closure experiment. Using zenith-viewing observations from the ground-based Far INfrarEd Spectrometer for Surface Emissivity (FINESSE) recorded during the WHAFFFERS campaign, we constrain atmospheric data taken from in situ sensors. With this optimised profile data we simulate PREFIRE-observed radiances for an overflight of our field site in eastern Canada. Simulations of the FINESSE radiances are in very good agreement with observations, while those from PREFIRE indicate some bias beyond the calculated uncertainties. We find that atmospheric water vapour specification, uncertain surface properties, and instrument noise dominate the uncertainties. Based on these findings, we highlight proposed techniques for closure experiments using terrestrial and satellite instruments alike. Such experiments will provide a ground-truth for validation of future FIR satellite missions.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 19(21)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (GB), National Centre for Earth Observation (GB), Space Science and Engineering Center (US), European Space Research and Technology Centre (NL), Imperial College London (GB), McGill University (CA)
McGill University, European Space Agency, Natural Environment Research Council
Climate action
Calibration and Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon