Reappraisal of the Relationship Between Assumptions and Realities in Economics: A Perspective from the Social Science of Practice

Heavily influenced by Western scientism, the economics profession strives to emulate classical physics in its search for universal laws that govern the complex world. However, the indeterminacy of the economic world means that economics cannot replicate classical physics, leaving mainstream economics perpetually entangled in a paradoxical relationship between theoretical assumptions and empirical realities, as it continually seeks universalization. In contrast, the social science of practice approach does not use assumption-driven frameworks to construct universal laws. Instead, it abstracts the real logic of actors’ behavior from practice, understood as the dualistic interaction between subjective and objective elements. This approach not only constitutes a powerful critique of formalist epistemology but also offers important insights into how to build a social science grounded in Chinese subjectivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern China
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00977004261433868
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reappraisal of the Relationship Between Assumptions and Realities in Economics: A Perspective from the Social Science of Practice

Luman Wang, Liuyang Zhao
Modern China
Economic Theory and Institutions
article

Reappraisal of the Relationship Between Assumptions and Realities in Economics: A Perspective from the Social Science of Practice

Luman Wang, Liuyang Zhao
article en

Abstract

Heavily influenced by Western scientism, the economics profession strives to emulate classical physics in its search for universal laws that govern the complex world. However, the indeterminacy of the economic world means that economics cannot replicate classical physics, leaving mainstream economics perpetually entangled in a paradoxical relationship between theoretical assumptions and empirical realities, as it continually seeks universalization. In contrast, the social science of practice approach does not use assumption-driven frameworks to construct universal laws. Instead, it abstracts the real logic of actors’ behavior from practice, understood as the dualistic interaction between subjective and objective elements. This approach not only constitutes a powerful critique of formalist epistemology but also offers important insights into how to build a social science grounded in Chinese subjectivity.

Modern China
Fudan University (CN), ShanghaiTech University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Economic Theory and Institutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Reappraisal of the Relationship Between Assumptions and Realities in Economics: A Perspective from the Social Science of Practice — Luman Wang, Liuyang Zhao · Modern China (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS