Motivation in multilingual CLIL: differences in male and female learners

Abstract Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has rapidly expanded across Europe in recent years; however, English has largely stolen the limelight as the language of instruction, with other target languages (TLs) receiving little attention. Furthermore, while factors such as motivation have been found to play an even more important role in CLIL, it is unclear whether this is so in English as well as in other TLs, given the qualitative difference between the motivation towards English as compared to other TLs. It has also been suggested that, while female students generally report higher motivation, CLIL may help to blur gender differences, as male learners may compensate for lower language learning motivation with higher motivation towards the subject they are studying. However, there is again a lack of research on whether this is the case in multiple TLs in CLIL. This study thus aims to explore these three factors, multilingual CLIL, motivation and gender, to determine whether higher motivation towards English is observed in multilingual CLIL, and whether this factor is dependent on the learners’ gender. Findings suggest that although males and females have comparable motivation towards each TL, differences arise particularly in terms of language anxiety and instrumentality. Pseudo-longitudinal analysis also reveals greater differences for males in French, while males’ English motivation and females’ motivation in both TLs were comparable across grades.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Applied Linguistics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2024-0018
Primary Topic
Second Language Learning and Teaching
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Motivation in multilingual CLIL: differences in male and female learners

Leah Geoghegan
European Journal of Applied Linguistics
Second Language Learning and Teaching
article

Motivation in multilingual CLIL: differences in male and female learners

Leah Geoghegan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) has rapidly expanded across Europe in recent years; however, English has largely stolen the limelight as the language of instruction, with other target languages (TLs) receiving little attention. Furthermore, while factors such as motivation have been found to play an even more important role in CLIL, it is unclear whether this is so in English as well as in other TLs, given the qualitative difference between the motivation towards English as compared to other TLs. It has also been suggested that, while female students generally report higher motivation, CLIL may help to blur gender differences, as male learners may compensate for lower language learning motivation with higher motivation towards the subject they are studying. However, there is again a lack of research on whether this is the case in multiple TLs in CLIL. This study thus aims to explore these three factors, multilingual CLIL, motivation and gender, to determine whether higher motivation towards English is observed in multilingual CLIL, and whether this factor is dependent on the learners’ gender. Findings suggest that although males and females have comparable motivation towards each TL, differences arise particularly in terms of language anxiety and instrumentality. Pseudo-longitudinal analysis also reveals greater differences for males in French, while males’ English motivation and females’ motivation in both TLs were comparable across grades.

European Journal of Applied Linguistics
Universidad de La Rioja (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Second Language Learning and Teaching
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.