Long-term Pain and Function Outcomes Associated With Lumbar Spine Surgery for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Target Trial Emulation

BACKGROUND: Conducting randomized controlled trials to measure the outcomes of lumbar spine surgery among patients with low back pain involves many methodological challenges. Using real-world data acquired from observational databases represents an alternative approach to attain evidence pertaining to lumbar spine surgery. This study aimed to measure the long-term pain and functional outcomes of patients with chronic low back pain treated with lumbar spine surgery compared with those receiving usual care. METHODS: A target trial emulation was performed using data acquired from the national Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation from April 2016 to April 2025. Following the exclusion of patients with prior lumbar spine surgery at registry enrollment, propensity scores were used to match 75 patients who subsequently underwent lumbar spine surgery with 75 patients who received usual care. Pain and function were measured for up to 36 months with a numerical rating scale and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: = 0.32). There was no difference in back-related disability between the lumbar spine surgery and usual care groups. CONCLUSIONS: This target trial emulation provides evidence on the long-term outcomes of lumbar spine surgery for chronic low back pain in lieu of randomized controlled trials. Lumbar spine surgery was associated with better pain outcomes, but not better function outcomes, over time. Target trial emulation and other studies involving high-quality observational databases may be used to provide evidence pertaining to lumbar spine surgery when conducting a randomized controlled trial is methodologically difficult or not feasible. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lumbar spine surgery yields clinically relevant improvement in low back pain intensity for up to 3 years compared with usual care; however, there is no comparable benefit in functioning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8893
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-term Pain and Function Outcomes Associated With Lumbar Spine Surgery for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Target Trial Emulation

John C. Licciardone, Subhash Aryal, Shahryar Malik, Crystal E. Peraza et al.
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Long-term Pain and Function Outcomes Associated With Lumbar Spine Surgery for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Target Trial Emulation

John C. Licciardone, Subhash Aryal, Shahryar Malik, Crystal E. Peraza, Saadia F. Shaikh, Kenneth M. Harrington, Arya S. Anagol
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conducting randomized controlled trials to measure the outcomes of lumbar spine surgery among patients with low back pain involves many methodological challenges. Using real-world data acquired from observational databases represents an alternative approach to attain evidence pertaining to lumbar spine surgery. This study aimed to measure the long-term pain and functional outcomes of patients with chronic low back pain treated with lumbar spine surgery compared with those receiving usual care. METHODS: A target trial emulation was performed using data acquired from the national Pain Registry for Epidemiological, Clinical, and Interventional Studies and Innovation from April 2016 to April 2025. Following the exclusion of patients with prior lumbar spine surgery at registry enrollment, propensity scores were used to match 75 patients who subsequently underwent lumbar spine surgery with 75 patients who received usual care. Pain and function were measured for up to 36 months with a numerical rating scale and the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS: = 0.32). There was no difference in back-related disability between the lumbar spine surgery and usual care groups. CONCLUSIONS: This target trial emulation provides evidence on the long-term outcomes of lumbar spine surgery for chronic low back pain in lieu of randomized controlled trials. Lumbar spine surgery was associated with better pain outcomes, but not better function outcomes, over time. Target trial emulation and other studies involving high-quality observational databases may be used to provide evidence pertaining to lumbar spine surgery when conducting a randomized controlled trial is methodologically difficult or not feasible. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Lumbar spine surgery yields clinically relevant improvement in low back pain intensity for up to 3 years compared with usual care; however, there is no comparable benefit in functioning.

The International Journal of Spine Surgery
University of North Texas (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.