The extended postoperative complication score: A dual-axis reporting plan for general surgery

BACKGROUND: Grading surgical complications and sequelae is of paramount importance for analyzing results and improving patient care and system performance and in optimizing resource allocation and use. Existing systems for surgical complication classification do not consistently account for baseline physiologic vulnerability and often conflate treatment intensity with clinical severity. This limitation reduces interpretability across diverse patient populations, particularly in emergency and elective general surgery. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel conducted a modified Delphi process to develop a dual-axis classification system, the Extended Postoperative Complication Score (EPCS). This system stratifies patients preoperatively into three baseline classes (A, B, C) reflecting physiologic reserve and immunocompetence. Postoperative events are then graded by physiologic impact from Grade 0 (minor, no impact) to Grade IV (death). Sequelae, defined as anticipated events related to underlying pathology or chronic disease, are separately categorized. Representatives of the most relevant international emergency and trauma surgical associations were involved (World Society of Emergency Surgery, European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Panamerican Trauma Society, EndoVascular and Trauma Management Society, Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery). RESULTS: The EPCS yields 18 mutually exclusive strata, combining five complication grades and three baseline classes, plus three sequelae codes. The matrix enables interpretable outcome reporting across settings, accounting for both event severity and host vulnerability. Expert consensus confirmed conceptual clarity and operational feasibility. The system allows applications to elective, urgent, and emergent operations, and is compatible with clinical audit, observational research, and pragmatic trials. CONCLUSIONS: The EPCS provides a structured, physiologically anchored method for postoperative complication stratification. Its dual-axis design may improve the validity of outcome comparisons and support real-world evaluation of surgical quality. Further validation is warranted through prospective multicenter implementation and time-bound observational methodologies. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2026;100:700-706. Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000005014
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The extended postoperative complication score: A dual-axis reporting plan for general surgery

Hayato Kurihara, Diego Mariani, Laura Besola, Marco Ceresoli et al.
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

The extended postoperative complication score: A dual-axis reporting plan for general surgery

Hayato Kurihara, Diego Mariani, Laura Besola, Marco Ceresoli, Camilla Cremonini, Viktor Reva, Manos Pikoulis, Enrico Cicuttin, Italy Pisa, Boris Kessel, Paula Ferrada, Fausto Catena, Yoram Kluger, Tal Horer, Arda Isik, Massimo Sartelli, Andrew W. Kirkpatrick, Matteo Cimino, Raul Coimbra, Federico Coccolini, Gary Bass, Walter L. Biffl, Andrea Colli, Mircea Chirica, Ernest E. Moore
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Grading surgical complications and sequelae is of paramount importance for analyzing results and improving patient care and system performance and in optimizing resource allocation and use. Existing systems for surgical complication classification do not consistently account for baseline physiologic vulnerability and often conflate treatment intensity with clinical severity. This limitation reduces interpretability across diverse patient populations, particularly in emergency and elective general surgery. METHODS: A multidisciplinary expert panel conducted a modified Delphi process to develop a dual-axis classification system, the Extended Postoperative Complication Score (EPCS). This system stratifies patients preoperatively into three baseline classes (A, B, C) reflecting physiologic reserve and immunocompetence. Postoperative events are then graded by physiologic impact from Grade 0 (minor, no impact) to Grade IV (death). Sequelae, defined as anticipated events related to underlying pathology or chronic disease, are separately categorized. Representatives of the most relevant international emergency and trauma surgical associations were involved (World Society of Emergency Surgery, European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery, American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Panamerican Trauma Society, EndoVascular and Trauma Management Society, Global Alliance for Infections in Surgery). RESULTS: The EPCS yields 18 mutually exclusive strata, combining five complication grades and three baseline classes, plus three sequelae codes. The matrix enables interpretable outcome reporting across settings, accounting for both event severity and host vulnerability. Expert consensus confirmed conceptual clarity and operational feasibility. The system allows applications to elective, urgent, and emergent operations, and is compatible with clinical audit, observational research, and pragmatic trials. CONCLUSIONS: The EPCS provides a structured, physiologically anchored method for postoperative complication stratification. Its dual-axis design may improve the validity of outcome comparisons and support real-world evaluation of surgical quality. Further validation is warranted through prospective multicenter implementation and time-bound observational methodologies. (J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2026;100:700-706. Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.).

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR), University Hospital Foundation (CA), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.