Selecting suitable predecessors: ecosystem services from cover crops to reduce tillage and fertilizer

Ecosystem services from cover crops can reduce reliance on external inputs and intensive management practices; however, these benefits depend on crop sequence compatibility. The effect of cover crop selection on weed suppression and crop yield was tested by no-till planting winter and summer cash crops into different cover crops that were terminated and used as mulches. Management treatments involving supplemental weeding and fertilizer were also applied to summer cash crops. Overall, this research evaluated 80 combinations of cover crops, cash crops, and management treatments across four site-years in a total of 1280 experimental units. In the absence of supplemental management, cash crops exhibited a 2.6-fold mean difference in weed biomass and a 7.3-fold mean difference in yield when no-till planted into the best- versus worst-performing cover crops, indicating that cover crop selection impacted ecosystem services. Insights from this research can guide cover crop selection and facilitate ecological intensification of agriculture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-53174-3
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selecting suitable predecessors: ecosystem services from cover crops to reduce tillage and fertilizer

Matthew R. Ryan, Uriel D. Menalled
Scientific Reports
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Selecting suitable predecessors: ecosystem services from cover crops to reduce tillage and fertilizer

Matthew R. Ryan, Uriel D. Menalled
article en

Abstract

Ecosystem services from cover crops can reduce reliance on external inputs and intensive management practices; however, these benefits depend on crop sequence compatibility. The effect of cover crop selection on weed suppression and crop yield was tested by no-till planting winter and summer cash crops into different cover crops that were terminated and used as mulches. Management treatments involving supplemental weeding and fertilizer were also applied to summer cash crops. Overall, this research evaluated 80 combinations of cover crops, cash crops, and management treatments across four site-years in a total of 1280 experimental units. In the absence of supplemental management, cash crops exhibited a 2.6-fold mean difference in weed biomass and a 7.3-fold mean difference in yield when no-till planted into the best- versus worst-performing cover crops, indicating that cover crop selection impacted ecosystem services. Insights from this research can guide cover crop selection and facilitate ecological intensification of agriculture.

Scientific Reports
Cornell University (US)
New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Selecting suitable predecessors: ecosystem services from cover crops to reduce tillage and fertilizer — Matthew R. Ryan, Uriel D. Menalled · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS