Environmental Externalities and Optimal Commodity Taxation Under ECSR: Revisiting the Origin‐Destination Principle Trade‐Off

ABSTRACT This paper explores the choice of origin versus destination tax principles in an open economy with strategic environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR). Conceptualizing ECSR as collective reputation, we analyze how pollution scope and consumer awareness shape the optimal regime. Under localized pollution, the origin principle generally dominates due to rent‐shifting efficiency, although a non‐monotonic sandwich result emerges at intermediate trade costs. Under global pollution, we challenge the conventional view that the destination principle is universally superior for preventing a race to the bottom. We identify a novel reputation rescue mechanism: in the high‐ECSR regime, the origin principle reclaims superiority because its production subsidies are essential to sustain collective reputation and preserve market viability. These findings offer a rationale for the policy divergence between the EU's CBAM and the US IRA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manchester School
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/manc.70046
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental Externalities and Optimal Commodity Taxation Under ECSR: Revisiting the Origin‐Destination Principle Trade‐Off

Hsiu‐Wei Chang, Chia‐Jen Chang, Tsaur‐Chin Wu
Manchester School
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Environmental Externalities and Optimal Commodity Taxation Under ECSR: Revisiting the Origin‐Destination Principle Trade‐Off

Hsiu‐Wei Chang, Chia‐Jen Chang, Tsaur‐Chin Wu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper explores the choice of origin versus destination tax principles in an open economy with strategic environmental corporate social responsibility (ECSR). Conceptualizing ECSR as collective reputation, we analyze how pollution scope and consumer awareness shape the optimal regime. Under localized pollution, the origin principle generally dominates due to rent‐shifting efficiency, although a non‐monotonic sandwich result emerges at intermediate trade costs. Under global pollution, we challenge the conventional view that the destination principle is universally superior for preventing a race to the bottom. We identify a novel reputation rescue mechanism: in the high‐ECSR regime, the origin principle reclaims superiority because its production subsidies are essential to sustain collective reputation and preserve market viability. These findings offer a rationale for the policy divergence between the EU's CBAM and the US IRA.

Manchester School
Feng Chia University (TW), National Changhua University of Education (TW), National Taipei University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.