Renal Trajectory of Eligible Simultaneous Liver–Kidney Transplant Recipients

Purpose: Simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation (SLK) eligible candidates may receive SLK or liver-alone transplant (LA) with access to kidney transplant after initial LA (KAL). We aimed to characterize SLK-eligible recipient outcomes according to treatment approach. Methods: This study utilized 2017–2023 SRTR data to identify SLK-eligible deceased donor liver transplants. Recipients were placed into two groups based on whether SLK was performed; non-SLK patients were sub-stratified into LA and KAL cohorts. After baseline comparisons, 2-year patient and graft survival outcomes were characterized by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Among 4879 candidates identified, 3746 (76.8%) underwent SLK, 1023 (21.0%) LA, and 110 (2.3%) KAL. SLK recipients maintained the highest eGFRs at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-transplant (p < 0.01). Compared to SLK recipients, non-SLK recipients had a higher 2-year risk of mortality (aHR 2.46, p < 0.01), all-cause events (aHR 1.91, p < 0.01), and liver graft failure (HR 1.55, p = 0.02). LA conferred a higher 2-year mortality risk (aHR 2.98, p < 0.01) and all-cause event risk (aHR 2.25, p < 0.01), while KAL had comparable mortality risk to SLK (aHR 0.43, p = 0.40). Conclusions: When SLK-eligible candidates undergo transplants, SLK remains the optimal path forward, even when a safety net kidney can be performed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livers
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6030042
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Renal Trajectory of Eligible Simultaneous Liver–Kidney Transplant Recipients

Heather McDade, Sarah Hussain, Al‐Faraaz Kassam, M Shah et al.
Livers
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Renal Trajectory of Eligible Simultaneous Liver–Kidney Transplant Recipients

Heather McDade, Sarah Hussain, Al‐Faraaz Kassam, M Shah, David Farhat, Benjamin Philosophe, Russell Wesson, Allan B. Massie, Ahmet Gurakar, Dorry L. Segev, Binuri Hapuarachchy, Andrew M. Cameron, Sharon Weeks, Elizabeth A. King, Reed Towle Jenkins
article en

Abstract

Purpose: Simultaneous liver–kidney transplantation (SLK) eligible candidates may receive SLK or liver-alone transplant (LA) with access to kidney transplant after initial LA (KAL). We aimed to characterize SLK-eligible recipient outcomes according to treatment approach. Methods: This study utilized 2017–2023 SRTR data to identify SLK-eligible deceased donor liver transplants. Recipients were placed into two groups based on whether SLK was performed; non-SLK patients were sub-stratified into LA and KAL cohorts. After baseline comparisons, 2-year patient and graft survival outcomes were characterized by univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis. Results: Among 4879 candidates identified, 3746 (76.8%) underwent SLK, 1023 (21.0%) LA, and 110 (2.3%) KAL. SLK recipients maintained the highest eGFRs at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years post-transplant (p < 0.01). Compared to SLK recipients, non-SLK recipients had a higher 2-year risk of mortality (aHR 2.46, p < 0.01), all-cause events (aHR 1.91, p < 0.01), and liver graft failure (HR 1.55, p = 0.02). LA conferred a higher 2-year mortality risk (aHR 2.98, p < 0.01) and all-cause event risk (aHR 2.25, p < 0.01), while KAL had comparable mortality risk to SLK (aHR 0.43, p = 0.40). Conclusions: When SLK-eligible candidates undergo transplants, SLK remains the optimal path forward, even when a safety net kidney can be performed.

LiversVol. 6(3)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.