Preoperative predictors of spacer retention and mortality in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasties: a single-center experience of 90 patients

BACKGROUND: Although two-stage revision arthroplasty achieves favorable infection control rates, a substantial proportion of patients experience spacer retention or short-term mortality. Therefore, the goal of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors associated with spacer retention and mortality during a two-stage approach. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included a consecutive series of 90 chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) of the hip treated with a two-stage revision between August 2017 and December 2021. Associations between potential risk factors and outcomes were analyzed using correlation analyses, and the effect size was quantified by Spearman's rho (r). Mortality rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 48 months (range 24 to 73), 19 patients (21%) did not undergo reimplantation, 23 patients (25.5%) had died, and two patients (2%) were lost to follow-up. Successful reimplantation was significantly associated with implantation of an articulating hip spacer (r = 0.57) and favorable periarticular soft tissue conditions (r = 0.25). Mortality was significantly correlated with a higher comorbidity burden (ASA ≥ 3; r = 0.36) and advanced age (≥ 80 years; r = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This study identified three simple, yet powerful prognostic markers of spacer retention and mortality. Implantation of an articulating hip spacer emerged as the strongest positive predictor of successful reimplantation, although it likely functions, at least in part, as a surrogate marker for favorable local bone and soft-tissue conditions. In contrast, advanced age and a high comorbidity burden were the strongest predictors of short-term mortality. These readily assessable prognostic markers may facilitate the identification of patients at the highest risk of not completing a two-stage approach or dying shortly after.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arthroplasty
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-026-00394-7
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative predictors of spacer retention and mortality in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasties: a single-center experience of 90 patients

Andre Lunz, Kevin‐Arno Koch, Andreas Geisbüsch, Burkhard Lehner et al.
Arthroplasty
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
article

Preoperative predictors of spacer retention and mortality in two-stage revision for infected total hip arthroplasties: a single-center experience of 90 patients

Andre Lunz, Kevin‐Arno Koch, Andreas Geisbüsch, Burkhard Lehner, Axel Horsch, Jascha Fell
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although two-stage revision arthroplasty achieves favorable infection control rates, a substantial proportion of patients experience spacer retention or short-term mortality. Therefore, the goal of this study was to identify preoperative risk factors associated with spacer retention and mortality during a two-stage approach. METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort study included a consecutive series of 90 chronic periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) of the hip treated with a two-stage revision between August 2017 and December 2021. Associations between potential risk factors and outcomes were analyzed using correlation analyses, and the effect size was quantified by Spearman's rho (r). Mortality rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 48 months (range 24 to 73), 19 patients (21%) did not undergo reimplantation, 23 patients (25.5%) had died, and two patients (2%) were lost to follow-up. Successful reimplantation was significantly associated with implantation of an articulating hip spacer (r = 0.57) and favorable periarticular soft tissue conditions (r = 0.25). Mortality was significantly correlated with a higher comorbidity burden (ASA ≥ 3; r = 0.36) and advanced age (≥ 80 years; r = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This study identified three simple, yet powerful prognostic markers of spacer retention and mortality. Implantation of an articulating hip spacer emerged as the strongest positive predictor of successful reimplantation, although it likely functions, at least in part, as a surrogate marker for favorable local bone and soft-tissue conditions. In contrast, advanced age and a high comorbidity burden were the strongest predictors of short-term mortality. These readily assessable prognostic markers may facilitate the identification of patients at the highest risk of not completing a two-stage approach or dying shortly after.

ArthroplastyVol. 8(1)
Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.