Cognitive Dissonance in Nursing: A Mixed Systematic Review of Its Impact and Coping Strategies

AIM: This mixed-method systematic review synthesised quantitative and qualitative empirical evidence on how cognitive dissonance triggered by care experiences and circumstances affects nurses' well-being, professional behaviour, patient care and on the coping strategies nurses use to manage these experiences. DESIGN: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, a convergent integrated synthesis approach combined qualitative and quantitative findings. DATA SOURCES: Sixteen studies were included following a comprehensive search across five databases in August 2024. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included: 12 qualitative, two quantitative and two mixed-methods. Four key themes were identified: (i) dissonance is triggered by conflicting demands, (ii) dissonance discomfort may generate lasting distress, (iii) dissonance influences nursing practice and quality of care and (iv) dissonance reduction efforts varied. Overall, the evidence base was limited in scope and predominantly qualitative, with included studies generally showing moderate to high methodological quality. CONCLUSION: Cognitive dissonance is a common but under-recognised challenge in nursing. It arises when actions conflict with professional standards or when nurses are prevented from providing necessary care. If unresolved, it harms nurses' psychological well-being, causing stress, emotional strain and reduced job satisfaction. It may also reduce the quality of care in nursing practice. There is a need for validated measurement tools, longitudinal research exploring long-term impacts and targeted interventions to support nurses. IMPACT: This review is the first to systematically synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence on cognitive dissonance in nursing. It addresses an important gap by bringing together findings on how dissonance arises in clinical settings, how nurses experience and manage it and its effects on practice and patient care. It also contributes to our understanding of coping strategies nurses use to cope with cognitive dissonance. The findings will support future research, education and interventions aimed at improving care quality and nurse well-being. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70638
Primary Topic
Nursing education and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Dissonance in Nursing: A Mixed Systematic Review of Its Impact and Coping Strategies

Xingge Sun, Jia Zeng, Mary Hughes, Jan de Vries
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Nursing education and management
article

Cognitive Dissonance in Nursing: A Mixed Systematic Review of Its Impact and Coping Strategies

Xingge Sun, Jia Zeng, Mary Hughes, Jan de Vries
article en

Abstract

AIM: This mixed-method systematic review synthesised quantitative and qualitative empirical evidence on how cognitive dissonance triggered by care experiences and circumstances affects nurses' well-being, professional behaviour, patient care and on the coping strategies nurses use to manage these experiences. DESIGN: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidance, a convergent integrated synthesis approach combined qualitative and quantitative findings. DATA SOURCES: Sixteen studies were included following a comprehensive search across five databases in August 2024. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included: 12 qualitative, two quantitative and two mixed-methods. Four key themes were identified: (i) dissonance is triggered by conflicting demands, (ii) dissonance discomfort may generate lasting distress, (iii) dissonance influences nursing practice and quality of care and (iv) dissonance reduction efforts varied. Overall, the evidence base was limited in scope and predominantly qualitative, with included studies generally showing moderate to high methodological quality. CONCLUSION: Cognitive dissonance is a common but under-recognised challenge in nursing. It arises when actions conflict with professional standards or when nurses are prevented from providing necessary care. If unresolved, it harms nurses' psychological well-being, causing stress, emotional strain and reduced job satisfaction. It may also reduce the quality of care in nursing practice. There is a need for validated measurement tools, longitudinal research exploring long-term impacts and targeted interventions to support nurses. IMPACT: This review is the first to systematically synthesise qualitative and quantitative evidence on cognitive dissonance in nursing. It addresses an important gap by bringing together findings on how dissonance arises in clinical settings, how nurses experience and manage it and its effects on practice and patient care. It also contributes to our understanding of coping strategies nurses use to cope with cognitive dissonance. The findings will support future research, education and interventions aimed at improving care quality and nurse well-being. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public involvement.

Journal of Advanced Nursing
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Nursing education and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.