Modeling the growth behavior of Fe <sub>2</sub> B coatings using the inverse Stefan method

Abstract In this study, an innovative mathematical model based on the inverse Stefan approach was developed to predict the growth kinetics of Fe 2 B layers formed on ASTM A29 steel during boriding. Microstructural characterization and the determination of the average coating thickness were carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy (OM), providing an accurate description of the typical morphology of the borided phase. To evaluate the tribological behavior of both the substrate and the borided steel, pin-on-disk wear tests were conducted, revealing a significant reduction in the coefficient of friction (COF), from 0.61 for the untreated material to 0.27 after boriding, corresponding to an improvement of approximately 226 % in wear resistance. Furthermore, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess the influence of the process parameters on the coating thickness ( u ). The results indicated that both temperature ( T ) and treatment time ( t ) are highly significant factors, contributing 62.80 % and 24.75 %, respectively, while the T × t interaction accounted for 7.66 % of the variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials Testing
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mt-2025-0520
Primary Topic
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling the growth behavior of Fe 2 B coatings using the inverse Stefan method

Oscar Gómez-Vargas, María de la Luz Moreno-González, Julio Vergara-Vázquez, Teresita de Jesús Cruz-Victoria et al.
Materials Testing
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
article

Modeling the growth behavior of Fe 2 B coatings using the inverse Stefan method

Oscar Gómez-Vargas, María de la Luz Moreno-González, Julio Vergara-Vázquez, Teresita de Jesús Cruz-Victoria, Martín Ortiz-Domínguez, Laura Nadxieli Palacios-Grijalva
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this study, an innovative mathematical model based on the inverse Stefan approach was developed to predict the growth kinetics of Fe 2 B layers formed on ASTM A29 steel during boriding. Microstructural characterization and the determination of the average coating thickness were carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy (OM), providing an accurate description of the typical morphology of the borided phase. To evaluate the tribological behavior of both the substrate and the borided steel, pin-on-disk wear tests were conducted, revealing a significant reduction in the coefficient of friction (COF), from 0.61 for the untreated material to 0.27 after boriding, corresponding to an improvement of approximately 226 % in wear resistance. Furthermore, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to assess the influence of the process parameters on the coating thickness ( u ). The results indicated that both temperature ( T ) and treatment time ( t ) are highly significant factors, contributing 62.80 % and 24.75 %, respectively, while the T × t interaction accounted for 7.66 % of the variation.

Materials Testing
Instituto Tecnológico de Puebla (MX), Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX), Universidad Intercultural de Chiapas (MX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Metal and Thin Film Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Modeling the growth behavior of Fe <sub>2</sub> B coatings using the inverse Stefan method — Oscar Gómez-Vargas, María de la Luz Moreno-González, et al. · Materials Testing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS