Feasibility of the Xemio app for breast cancer survivors in a clinical setting: Adherence, acceptance, and side effect monitoring (CTCAE vs. QoL)

Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide, posing significant challenges for survivors, including long-term physical, emotional, and cognitive effects. Mobile health (mHealth) tools provide new opportunities to support these patients by enabling symptom tracking, side effect management, and personalized interventions. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the Xemio-Research mHealth application as a digital support tool for breast cancer survivors in a clinical setting. It assessed user adherence, system usability, and patient experience. A secondary objective was to compare self-reported side effects in the app with traditional quality-of-life questionnaires. This prospective study was conducted over one year within a European research project. Breast cancer survivors were recruited from a clinical setting, where they installed the Xemio-Research app and were guided on its use. During the study period, participants tracked symptoms, reported side effects, and engaged with the app. Adherence was measured through interaction logs and activity tracking. Usability was assessed using a validated scale, and patient feedback was collected through structured and open-ended survey questions. Among 61 enrolled participants, 49 actively used the app. Adherence was high in the first three months (96%) but declined to 35% by the final trimester. Usability was rated as excellent (82.78/100), and 87% of respondents recommended the app. The app enabled more detailed symptom tracking compared to traditional quality-of-life questionnaires, particularly for joint pain, tingling, and muscle weakness. The Xemio-Research app demonstrated feasibility and acceptability for breast cancer survivors, offering valuable insights into patient-reported outcomes and side effect management. However, sustaining long-term engagement remains a challenge. Integrating real-time symptom tracking with conventional assessments may enhance personalized care and survivorship outcomes. This study is a sub-study of the clinical trial registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05401643).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0342702
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility of the Xemio app for breast cancer survivors in a clinical setting: Adherence, acceptance, and side effect monitoring (CTCAE vs. QoL)

Montserrat Muñoz-Mateu, Imma Grau, Manuel Armayones Ruiz, Antoni Sisó-Almirall et al.
PLoS ONE
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Feasibility of the Xemio app for breast cancer survivors in a clinical setting: Adherence, acceptance, and side effect monitoring (CTCAE vs. QoL)

Montserrat Muñoz-Mateu, Imma Grau, Manuel Armayones Ruiz, Antoni Sisó-Almirall, Santiago Frid, Maria-Angeles Fuentes-Expósito
article en

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer worldwide, posing significant challenges for survivors, including long-term physical, emotional, and cognitive effects. Mobile health (mHealth) tools provide new opportunities to support these patients by enabling symptom tracking, side effect management, and personalized interventions. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the Xemio-Research mHealth application as a digital support tool for breast cancer survivors in a clinical setting. It assessed user adherence, system usability, and patient experience. A secondary objective was to compare self-reported side effects in the app with traditional quality-of-life questionnaires. This prospective study was conducted over one year within a European research project. Breast cancer survivors were recruited from a clinical setting, where they installed the Xemio-Research app and were guided on its use. During the study period, participants tracked symptoms, reported side effects, and engaged with the app. Adherence was measured through interaction logs and activity tracking. Usability was assessed using a validated scale, and patient feedback was collected through structured and open-ended survey questions. Among 61 enrolled participants, 49 actively used the app. Adherence was high in the first three months (96%) but declined to 35% by the final trimester. Usability was rated as excellent (82.78/100), and 87% of respondents recommended the app. The app enabled more detailed symptom tracking compared to traditional quality-of-life questionnaires, particularly for joint pain, tingling, and muscle weakness. The Xemio-Research app demonstrated feasibility and acceptability for breast cancer survivors, offering valuable insights into patient-reported outcomes and side effect management. However, sustaining long-term engagement remains a challenge. Integrating real-time symptom tracking with conventional assessments may enhance personalized care and survivorship outcomes. This study is a sub-study of the clinical trial registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05401643).

PLoS ONEVol. 21(5)
Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.