Predicting chicken body weight from genotypes: Performance comparison of deep convolutional neural networks, artificial neural networks, ensemble models and RR-BLUP

Genomic prediction is a cornerstone of poultry breeding, enabling accelerated improvement of complex traits. This study evaluated the predictive performance of machine learning models including a deep convolutional neural network (DeepGS), artificial neural network (ANN) and ensemble model combining DeepGS with ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) as well as conventional statistical RR-BLUP model for genotype-to-phenotype prediction of body weight in chickens using genome-wide marker data. Predictive accuracy assessed via Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) between observed and predicted phenotypes, was similarly high for DeepGS, RR-BLUP and ensemble model (PCC = 0.89) whereas ANN showed slightly lower correlation (PCC = 0.84). Analysis of absolute prediction errors revealed median deviations were comparable among DeepGS, RR-BLUP and ensemble model, with ANN exhibiting greater variability and occasional errors. Examination of top-ranked individuals revealed ANN model better preserved phenotypic ranking among elite birds (PCC = 0.52) compared with RR-BLUP (0.47), ensemble model (0.34) and DeepGS (0.32). Strong concordance among DeepGS, RR-BLUP and ensemble model predictions (PCCs 0.94–1.00) indicates that additive genetic effects dominate body weight variation. Results demonstrate that no single model uniformly outperforms others across all metrics, emphasizing the need to balance prediction accuracy, stability, and ranking performance based on breeding objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livestock Studies
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46897/livestockstudies.1939933
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting chicken body weight from genotypes: Performance comparison of deep convolutional neural networks, artificial neural networks, ensemble models and RR-BLUP

Kiplangat Ngeno
Livestock Studies
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Predicting chicken body weight from genotypes: Performance comparison of deep convolutional neural networks, artificial neural networks, ensemble models and RR-BLUP

Kiplangat Ngeno
article en

Abstract

Genomic prediction is a cornerstone of poultry breeding, enabling accelerated improvement of complex traits. This study evaluated the predictive performance of machine learning models including a deep convolutional neural network (DeepGS), artificial neural network (ANN) and ensemble model combining DeepGS with ridge regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP) as well as conventional statistical RR-BLUP model for genotype-to-phenotype prediction of body weight in chickens using genome-wide marker data. Predictive accuracy assessed via Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) between observed and predicted phenotypes, was similarly high for DeepGS, RR-BLUP and ensemble model (PCC = 0.89) whereas ANN showed slightly lower correlation (PCC = 0.84). Analysis of absolute prediction errors revealed median deviations were comparable among DeepGS, RR-BLUP and ensemble model, with ANN exhibiting greater variability and occasional errors. Examination of top-ranked individuals revealed ANN model better preserved phenotypic ranking among elite birds (PCC = 0.52) compared with RR-BLUP (0.47), ensemble model (0.34) and DeepGS (0.32). Strong concordance among DeepGS, RR-BLUP and ensemble model predictions (PCCs 0.94–1.00) indicates that additive genetic effects dominate body weight variation. Results demonstrate that no single model uniformly outperforms others across all metrics, emphasizing the need to balance prediction accuracy, stability, and ranking performance based on breeding objectives.

Livestock Studies(Advanced Online Publication)
Moi University (KE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.