Efficacy of the use of 3D printing models in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures: a pilot randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries requiring precise preoperative planning. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a valuable tool to enhance fracture visualization and surgical decision-making. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative planning assisted by 3D-printed models improves operative efficiency and clinical outcomes in tibial plateau fracture surgery, compared to conventional imaging. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted including 35 patients with surgically treated tibial plateau fractures. Participants were assigned to standard planning based on radiographs and CT (control group) or to 3D-assisted planning using a patient-specific printed model (3D group). Primary outcomes were operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy time. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, range of motion, pain, patient-reported outcomes (KOOS, EQ-5D, WOMAC), and radiological results (Rasmussen score). Surgeons in the 3D group completed a questionnaire to assess changes in preoperative strategy due to the model. RESULTS: 33 patients were analyzed (18 in 3D group, 15 in control). The 3D group showed shorter operative times (median 100 vs 119 min) and reduced fluoroscopy use (98 vs 100 s), though not statistically significant. The 3D models influenced surgical strategy in most cases, particularly in reduction planning and implant selection. No differences in complication rates or functional outcomes were observed. At 12 months, both groups achieved excellent recovery with similar KOOS, EQ-5D, WOMAC, and Rasmussen scores. CONCLUSION: 3D-printed models offer a safe and reproducible planning tool that may improve operative efficiency in tibial plateau fractures. Although functional outcomes were equivalent, there were non-significant trends suggesting a potential benefit that requires confirmation in larger, adequately powered studies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05571449, registered on 1 October 2022. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-026-06950-w
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of the use of 3D printing models in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Pedro Garrido, Ana Isabel de Cáceres Velasco, Óscar Sánchez Mallo, Marina García Cantarero
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Efficacy of the use of 3D printing models in the treatment of tibial plateau fractures: a pilot randomized clinical trial

Pedro Garrido, Ana Isabel de Cáceres Velasco, Óscar Sánchez Mallo, Marina García Cantarero
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tibial plateau fractures are complex injuries requiring precise preoperative planning. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has emerged as a valuable tool to enhance fracture visualization and surgical decision-making. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative planning assisted by 3D-printed models improves operative efficiency and clinical outcomes in tibial plateau fracture surgery, compared to conventional imaging. METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted including 35 patients with surgically treated tibial plateau fractures. Participants were assigned to standard planning based on radiographs and CT (control group) or to 3D-assisted planning using a patient-specific printed model (3D group). Primary outcomes were operative time and intraoperative fluoroscopy time. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, range of motion, pain, patient-reported outcomes (KOOS, EQ-5D, WOMAC), and radiological results (Rasmussen score). Surgeons in the 3D group completed a questionnaire to assess changes in preoperative strategy due to the model. RESULTS: 33 patients were analyzed (18 in 3D group, 15 in control). The 3D group showed shorter operative times (median 100 vs 119 min) and reduced fluoroscopy use (98 vs 100 s), though not statistically significant. The 3D models influenced surgical strategy in most cases, particularly in reduction planning and implant selection. No differences in complication rates or functional outcomes were observed. At 12 months, both groups achieved excellent recovery with similar KOOS, EQ-5D, WOMAC, and Rasmussen scores. CONCLUSION: 3D-printed models offer a safe and reproducible planning tool that may improve operative efficiency in tibial plateau fractures. Although functional outcomes were equivalent, there were non-significant trends suggesting a potential benefit that requires confirmation in larger, adequately powered studies. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05571449, registered on 1 October 2022. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.