Cannabis Use Disorder as a disorder of motivational dysregulation: a systematic review of clinical, neurocognitive, and treatment evidence

This systematic review evaluated whether CUD can be coherently reconceptualized as a disorder of motivational dysregulation by synthesizing clinical, neurocognitive, and treatment-related evidence published over the last 10 years. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between January 2015 and January 2026, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included adults with CUD and examined motivational processes, decision-making, reward valuation, goal-directed behavior, or motivation-focused mechanisms of treatment. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were included. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, with disagreements resolved through consensus Risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools appropriate to study design, and findings were synthesized narratively. Convergent evidence indicated clinically salient motivational features such as persistent ambivalence, diminished intrinsic goal pursuit, and return to use driven by contextual and affective factors rather than consumption severity alone. Neurocognitive findings implicated alterations in reward prediction, effort-based decision-making, and executive control relevant to motivational regulation. Interventions explicitly targeting motivation demonstrated superior engagement and treatment outcomes compared with abstinence-centric or deterrence-based approaches. Overall, risk of bias was low in well-conducted randomized controlled trials, while observational and neurocognitive studies demonstrated moderate risk due to potential confounding and measurement variability. Case-series designs exhibited higher risk of bias. In conclusion the evidence from the past decade supports reframing CUD as a disorder of motivational dysregulation rather than consumption per se, with important implications for assessment, treatment design, and return to use prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Addictive Diseases
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2026.2667987
Primary Topic
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cannabis Use Disorder as a disorder of motivational dysregulation: a systematic review of clinical, neurocognitive, and treatment evidence

Sidharth Mishra, Sayali Mishra, Sibanarayan Rath, Ashwini Rajmohan
Journal of Addictive Diseases
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
article

Cannabis Use Disorder as a disorder of motivational dysregulation: a systematic review of clinical, neurocognitive, and treatment evidence

Sidharth Mishra, Sayali Mishra, Sibanarayan Rath, Ashwini Rajmohan
article en

Abstract

This systematic review evaluated whether CUD can be coherently reconceptualized as a disorder of motivational dysregulation by synthesizing clinical, neurocognitive, and treatment-related evidence published over the last 10 years. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between January 2015 and January 2026, in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Eligible studies included adults with CUD and examined motivational processes, decision-making, reward valuation, goal-directed behavior, or motivation-focused mechanisms of treatment. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies were included. Two independent reviewers conducted study selection, with disagreements resolved through consensus Risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools appropriate to study design, and findings were synthesized narratively. Convergent evidence indicated clinically salient motivational features such as persistent ambivalence, diminished intrinsic goal pursuit, and return to use driven by contextual and affective factors rather than consumption severity alone. Neurocognitive findings implicated alterations in reward prediction, effort-based decision-making, and executive control relevant to motivational regulation. Interventions explicitly targeting motivation demonstrated superior engagement and treatment outcomes compared with abstinence-centric or deterrence-based approaches. Overall, risk of bias was low in well-conducted randomized controlled trials, while observational and neurocognitive studies demonstrated moderate risk due to potential confounding and measurement variability. Case-series designs exhibited higher risk of bias. In conclusion the evidence from the past decade supports reframing CUD as a disorder of motivational dysregulation rather than consumption per se, with important implications for assessment, treatment design, and return to use prevention.

Journal of Addictive Diseases
University Mental Health Research Institute (GR), KIIT University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.