Integrating eDNA metabarcoding into fish-based ecological indices for lowland rivers under the EU Water Framework Directive

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is widely used as a non-invasive alternative to catch-based methods for fish monitoring in general, with strong potential to support the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) in particular. However, its suitability for ecological index calculation and intercalibration under the WFD remains largely unknown. We therefore compare eDNA metabarcoding and electrofishing at 91 sites of lowland rivers across a habitat pressure gradient in Flanders (Belgium), and evaluate the integration of eDNA-derived fish community data into the fish-based lowland Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI). Specifically, we compared (i) fish species richness and (ii) Ecological Quality Ratios (EQRs) between eDNA metabarcoding and electrofishing across all sites, and for a subset of sites across a seasonal gradient. eDNA metabarcoding consistently detected higher species richness than electrofishing, and showed high within-site replicability. Additionally, eDNA-derived species richness showed an asymptotic relationship with electrofishing-based richness, reflecting differing variation in detection sensitivity across the richness gradient. Despite pronounced metric-level differences, eDNA-derived EQRs did not differ significantly from those obtained using the fish-based index. Agreement between eDNA- and fish-based EQRs showed no evidence of systematic bias. Both methods yielded seasonally stable EQR values and showed consistent negative responses to increasing habitat pressure. Moreover, our results show that eDNA metabarcoding yields Ecological Quality Classes (EQCs) comparable to conventional fish-based assessments. These findings support a hybrid WFD monitoring approach in lowland rivers, in which eDNA enables cost-effective, broad-scale status assessment combined with targeted electrofishing providing more detailed information about recruitment and size-structure of the fish populations. Development of eDNA-native indices and typology-specific calibration as next critical steps toward broader regulatory implementation are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Sciences Europe
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-026-01388-7
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating eDNA metabarcoding into fish-based ecological indices for lowland rivers under the EU Water Framework Directive

Gerlinde Van Thuyne, Sabrina Neyrinck, Tom Ruttink, Charlotte Van Driessche et al.
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Integrating eDNA metabarcoding into fish-based ecological indices for lowland rivers under the EU Water Framework Directive

Gerlinde Van Thuyne, Sabrina Neyrinck, Tom Ruttink, Charlotte Van Driessche, Els Lommelen, Dries Bonte, Rein Brys, Teun Everts
article en

Abstract

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is widely used as a non-invasive alternative to catch-based methods for fish monitoring in general, with strong potential to support the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) in particular. However, its suitability for ecological index calculation and intercalibration under the WFD remains largely unknown. We therefore compare eDNA metabarcoding and electrofishing at 91 sites of lowland rivers across a habitat pressure gradient in Flanders (Belgium), and evaluate the integration of eDNA-derived fish community data into the fish-based lowland Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI). Specifically, we compared (i) fish species richness and (ii) Ecological Quality Ratios (EQRs) between eDNA metabarcoding and electrofishing across all sites, and for a subset of sites across a seasonal gradient. eDNA metabarcoding consistently detected higher species richness than electrofishing, and showed high within-site replicability. Additionally, eDNA-derived species richness showed an asymptotic relationship with electrofishing-based richness, reflecting differing variation in detection sensitivity across the richness gradient. Despite pronounced metric-level differences, eDNA-derived EQRs did not differ significantly from those obtained using the fish-based index. Agreement between eDNA- and fish-based EQRs showed no evidence of systematic bias. Both methods yielded seasonally stable EQR values and showed consistent negative responses to increasing habitat pressure. Moreover, our results show that eDNA metabarcoding yields Ecological Quality Classes (EQCs) comparable to conventional fish-based assessments. These findings support a hybrid WFD monitoring approach in lowland rivers, in which eDNA enables cost-effective, broad-scale status assessment combined with targeted electrofishing providing more detailed information about recruitment and size-structure of the fish populations. Development of eDNA-native indices and typology-specific calibration as next critical steps toward broader regulatory implementation are discussed.

Environmental Sciences Europe
Research Institute for Nature and Forest (BE), Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (BE), Ghent University (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.