Revival of the reactor antineutrino anomaly

The Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly (RAA) refers to the deficit observed between the average event rate measured in reactor antineutrino experiments with respect to the theoretical prediction. This anomaly was first identified in 2011 ($2.5\,σ$) as a consequence of the Huber-Muller reactor antineutrino flux calculation. It was thought to be resolved in 2021 as a result of previous reactor antineutrino flux calculations, with a reduction to about $1\,σ$. In this work, we present the RAA obtained with the latest reactor antineutrino flux calculation published in 2023 by a French research group, which was never used before for the calculation of the RAA. It is the first summation flux model which includes a comprehensive uncertainty budget. The result indicates a revival of the RAA at the level of $2.2\,σ$. We also consider the usual simplest explanation of the RAA by active-sterile neutrino oscillations. We present the constraints on the oscillation parameters and we derive a tension of $3.8\,σ$ with the results of gallium source experiments (Gallium Anomaly) taking into account also the solar neutrino and KATRIN bounds, that of the combined short-baseline reactor spectral ratio measurements, and that of the Daya Bay search for a sub-eV sterile neutrino. Since the tension may be due to underestimated systematic uncertainties and the main tension is between the gallium data and the other data, we finally present the results of a global analysis with enlarged gallium uncertainties, which reduce the global tension to $1.3\,σ$.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2026-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/rt62-4rq2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neutrino Physics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revival of the reactor antineutrino anomaly

Carlo Giunti A, R. P. Zhang, Y. G. Li
1 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Neutrino Physics Research
1.95
article

Revival of the reactor antineutrino anomaly

Carlo Giunti A, R. P. Zhang, Y. G. Li
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The Reactor Antineutrino Anomaly (RAA) refers to the deficit observed between the average event rate measured in reactor antineutrino experiments with respect to the theoretical prediction. This anomaly was first identified in 2011 ($2.5\,σ$) as a consequence of the Huber-Muller reactor antineutrino flux calculation. It was thought to be resolved in 2021 as a result of previous reactor antineutrino flux calculations, with a reduction to about $1\,σ$. In this work, we present the RAA obtained with the latest reactor antineutrino flux calculation published in 2023 by a French research group, which was never used before for the calculation of the RAA. It is the first summation flux model which includes a comprehensive uncertainty budget. The result indicates a revival of the RAA at the level of $2.2\,σ$. We also consider the usual simplest explanation of the RAA by active-sterile neutrino oscillations. We present the constraints on the oscillation parameters and we derive a tension of $3.8\,σ$ with the results of gallium source experiments (Gallium Anomaly) taking into account also the solar neutrino and KATRIN bounds, that of the combined short-baseline reactor spectral ratio measurements, and that of the Daya Bay search for a sub-eV sterile neutrino. Since the tension may be due to underestimated systematic uncertainties and the main tension is between the gallium data and the other data, we finally present the results of a global analysis with enlarged gallium uncertainties, which reduce the global tension to $1.3\,σ$.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neutrino Physics Research
1.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon