HER2 discordance between primary and metastatic gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major global health burden, with poor survival rates. HER2 is a key biomarker for targeted therapy, but discordance between primary tumors and metastases may impact treatment decisions. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence and clinical relevance of HER2 status differences between primary gastric cancers and metastatic lesions. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted for studies assessing HER2 status in matched primary and metastatic gastric cancer samples. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses by metastatic site were performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software, version 4.2.3. RESULTS: = 78.2%), with proportions of 93% in peritoneum, 81% lymph nodes, 69% in liver metastases, and 62% in lung. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity in HER2 expression between primary and metastatic gastric cancer underscores the need for reassessment of HER2 status in metastatic sites. Relying solely on primary tumor samples may lead to underestimation of HER2 positivity and suboptimal therapeutic decisions. Incorporating site-specific HER2 testing into clinical practice may enhance patient selection for HER2-targeted therapies and improve treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical & Translational Oncology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-026-04359-9
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HER2 discordance between primary and metastatic gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Francisco Cézar Aquino de Moraes, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Ana C. Melo, Thiago Gorayeb Rebelo et al.
Clinical & Translational Oncology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

HER2 discordance between primary and metastatic gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Francisco Cézar Aquino de Moraes, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Ana C. Melo, Thiago Gorayeb Rebelo, Luis Henrique Rios Moreira Rego
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major global health burden, with poor survival rates. HER2 is a key biomarker for targeted therapy, but discordance between primary tumors and metastases may impact treatment decisions. This meta-analysis evaluated the prevalence and clinical relevance of HER2 status differences between primary gastric cancers and metastatic lesions. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted for studies assessing HER2 status in matched primary and metastatic gastric cancer samples. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses by metastatic site were performed. Statistical analyses were conducted using R software, version 4.2.3. RESULTS: = 78.2%), with proportions of 93% in peritoneum, 81% lymph nodes, 69% in liver metastases, and 62% in lung. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity in HER2 expression between primary and metastatic gastric cancer underscores the need for reassessment of HER2 status in metastatic sites. Relying solely on primary tumor samples may lead to underestimation of HER2 positivity and suboptimal therapeutic decisions. Incorporating site-specific HER2 testing into clinical practice may enhance patient selection for HER2-targeted therapies and improve treatment outcomes.

Clinical & Translational Oncology
University of Ottawa (CA), Universidade Estadual do Piauí (BR), Methodist Hospital (US), Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.