Generative AI in education: Process-aware pedagogy, assessment integrity, and institutional governance

<ns3:p>Background Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models such as ChatGPT, is rapidly transforming higher education by reshaping how knowledge is produced, assessed, and mediated through digital systems. While these tools offer new opportunities for learning support and instructional efficiency, they also raise significant concerns regarding academic integrity, institutional governance, and ethical sustainability. Methods This study conducts a qualitative thematic literature review of research published between 2020 and 2025. Using thematic synthesis, the study analyzes scholarly articles, institutional reports, and policy discussions addressing the integration of generative AI in higher education. The analysis focuses on four thematic areas: the rise of GenAI in educational contexts, academic integrity challenges, institutional and policy responses, and ethical and environmental implications. Results The review identifies four key tensions shaping current debates: rapid student adoption outpacing institutional readiness; growing ambiguity in authorship and assessment practices; fragmented policy responses ranging from prohibition to cautious integration; and limited attention to the ethical and environmental costs of large-scale AI deployment. The findings indicate that these issues are frequently discussed in isolation rather than as interconnected challenges. Conclusions The study argues for a process-aware pedagogical framework, referred to as augmented pedagogy, that positions generative AI as a cognitive scaffold rather than a substitute for learning. Such an approach emphasizes transparency in AI use, process-oriented assessment, and responsible institutional governance to ensure that AI integration strengthens rather than undermines the educational mission of universities.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2026-05-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.23343.1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in education: Process-aware pedagogy, assessment integrity, and institutional governance

Sejdi Sejdiu, Nora Pireci Sejdiu, Simone Grassini
Open Research Europe
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Generative AI in education: Process-aware pedagogy, assessment integrity, and institutional governance

Sejdi Sejdiu, Nora Pireci Sejdiu, Simone Grassini
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), particularly large language models such as ChatGPT, is rapidly transforming higher education by reshaping how knowledge is produced, assessed, and mediated through digital systems. While these tools offer new opportunities for learning support and instructional efficiency, they also raise significant concerns regarding academic integrity, institutional governance, and ethical sustainability. Methods This study conducts a qualitative thematic literature review of research published between 2020 and 2025. Using thematic synthesis, the study analyzes scholarly articles, institutional reports, and policy discussions addressing the integration of generative AI in higher education. The analysis focuses on four thematic areas: the rise of GenAI in educational contexts, academic integrity challenges, institutional and policy responses, and ethical and environmental implications. Results The review identifies four key tensions shaping current debates: rapid student adoption outpacing institutional readiness; growing ambiguity in authorship and assessment practices; fragmented policy responses ranging from prohibition to cautious integration; and limited attention to the ethical and environmental costs of large-scale AI deployment. The findings indicate that these issues are frequently discussed in isolation rather than as interconnected challenges. Conclusions The study argues for a process-aware pedagogical framework, referred to as augmented pedagogy, that positions generative AI as a cognitive scaffold rather than a substitute for learning. Such an approach emphasizes transparency in AI use, process-oriented assessment, and responsible institutional governance to ensure that AI integration strengthens rather than undermines the educational mission of universities.</ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 6
Tongren University (CN), University of Bergen (NO), University of Prishtina (XK)
European Cooperation in Science and Technology
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.