Effects of whole-body strength training on pain and strength in chronic low back pain. A Randomized controlled trial

), and isometric trunk flexion/extension strength (kg) were assessed baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and follow-up (T2, NRS only).Results32 Patients finished the intervention and were analyzed. For PPT, an interaction effect for 'time' × 'group' was observed (p = 0.048) and the IG showed improvements in PPT (T0 = 38.2 ± 21.1; T1 = 48.1 ± 29.1), while the CG showed no change. A main effect 'time' (p < 0.001) and no interaction effect (p = 0.737) was observed for NRS. In the IG, NRS was lower at T1 and T2 compared to T0 (T0 = 5.0 ± 1.7; T1 = 3.8 ± 1.7; T2 = 3.8 ± 1.5), while no difference was found in the CG. For core extension and flexion strength, main effects 'time' (p ≤ 0.001) and no interaction effects (p > 0.071) were observed, while strength increased only in the IG (extension: T0 = 60.0 ± 23.7; T1 = 74.4 ± 28.9; flexion: T0 = 40.3 ± 16.9; T1 = 48.5 ± 19.2). PPT correlated positively with trunk strength (r = 0.320-0.621).ConclusionWBST combined with group exercise improves lumbar pain sensitivity in CLBP patients and might therefore be considered as an efficient training option within rehabilitation programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261448967
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of whole-body strength training on pain and strength in chronic low back pain. A Randomized controlled trial

F Tomschi, T Hilberg, Kaspar Meder
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Effects of whole-body strength training on pain and strength in chronic low back pain. A Randomized controlled trial

F Tomschi, T Hilberg, Kaspar Meder
article en

Abstract

), and isometric trunk flexion/extension strength (kg) were assessed baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), and follow-up (T2, NRS only).Results32 Patients finished the intervention and were analyzed. For PPT, an interaction effect for 'time' × 'group' was observed (p = 0.048) and the IG showed improvements in PPT (T0 = 38.2 ± 21.1; T1 = 48.1 ± 29.1), while the CG showed no change. A main effect 'time' (p < 0.001) and no interaction effect (p = 0.737) was observed for NRS. In the IG, NRS was lower at T1 and T2 compared to T0 (T0 = 5.0 ± 1.7; T1 = 3.8 ± 1.7; T2 = 3.8 ± 1.5), while no difference was found in the CG. For core extension and flexion strength, main effects 'time' (p ≤ 0.001) and no interaction effects (p > 0.071) were observed, while strength increased only in the IG (extension: T0 = 60.0 ± 23.7; T1 = 74.4 ± 28.9; flexion: T0 = 40.3 ± 16.9; T1 = 48.5 ± 19.2). PPT correlated positively with trunk strength (r = 0.320-0.621).ConclusionWBST combined with group exercise improves lumbar pain sensitivity in CLBP patients and might therefore be considered as an efficient training option within rehabilitation programs.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
University of Wuppertal (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.