In-hospital rotavirus vaccination in premature and medically ill infants: a systematic review of uptake and safety

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus vaccination is widely recommended in infancy and has substantially reduced morbidity from severe gastroenteritis. In premature and medically ill infants, prolonged hospitalization often interferes with timely vaccination. Despite recommendations to vaccinate clinically stable hospitalized infants according to chronological age, concerns regarding adverse events, apnea-bradycardia episodes, and nosocomial transmission continue to limit uptake in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Delayed vaccination may result in missed opportunities, as initiation after 24 weeks of age is contraindicated. The objective of this review was to systematically assess the evidence on the administration of rotavirus vaccines to premature and medically ill infants during their in-hospital stay (e.g., neonatal intensive care units or postnatal wards), and to evaluate the occurrence, type, and frequency of adverse events following such vaccination. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched without restrictions on publication year or language. Eligible studies included premature or medically ill infants who received rotavirus vaccination during hospitalization. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series with at least five infants were considered. Data were extracted on vaccination uptake, adverse events, viral shedding, and nosocomial infection. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fifteen observational studies including a total number of 5,443 infants met inclusion criteria; no randomized controlled trials were identified. Vaccination uptake varied widely and was generally low in routine clinical practice. Reported adverse events were predominantly mild and transient, with gastrointestinal symptoms being most common. Fever occurred in up to 10% of vaccinated infants. No cases of intussusception or volvulus were reported. Apnea-bradycardia episodes were inconsistently documented; where assessed, their frequency was comparable to baseline rates or to those observed after routine two-month vaccinations. Viral shedding of vaccine-strain rotavirus was frequently detected, particularly after the first dose; however, nosocomial transmission to unvaccinated infants was rare and not associated with symptomatic gastroenteritis. Overall certainty of evidence was low due to heterogeneity and moderate to high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that in-hospital rotavirus vaccination in clinically stable premature and medically ill infants is generally safe and not associated with relevant nosocomial infection. Nevertheless, uptake remains inconsistent. Standardized protocols, provider education, and implementation-focused strategies are needed to reduce missed vaccination opportunities and ensure timely protection in this high-risk population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION (PROSPERO): CRD420251163827.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40348-026-00238-z
Primary Topic
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In-hospital rotavirus vaccination in premature and medically ill infants: a systematic review of uptake and safety

Mark Dzietko, Ertan Mayatepek, Janna-Lina Kerth, Tim Vogel et al.
Molecular and Cellular Pediatrics
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
article

In-hospital rotavirus vaccination in premature and medically ill infants: a systematic review of uptake and safety

Mark Dzietko, Ertan Mayatepek, Janna-Lina Kerth, Tim Vogel, Jonas Obitz, Calvin Kurz
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus vaccination is widely recommended in infancy and has substantially reduced morbidity from severe gastroenteritis. In premature and medically ill infants, prolonged hospitalization often interferes with timely vaccination. Despite recommendations to vaccinate clinically stable hospitalized infants according to chronological age, concerns regarding adverse events, apnea-bradycardia episodes, and nosocomial transmission continue to limit uptake in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Delayed vaccination may result in missed opportunities, as initiation after 24 weeks of age is contraindicated. The objective of this review was to systematically assess the evidence on the administration of rotavirus vaccines to premature and medically ill infants during their in-hospital stay (e.g., neonatal intensive care units or postnatal wards), and to evaluate the occurrence, type, and frequency of adverse events following such vaccination. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Medline, Embase, and Web of Science were searched without restrictions on publication year or language. Eligible studies included premature or medically ill infants who received rotavirus vaccination during hospitalization. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, and case series with at least five infants were considered. Data were extracted on vaccination uptake, adverse events, viral shedding, and nosocomial infection. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools, and certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Fifteen observational studies including a total number of 5,443 infants met inclusion criteria; no randomized controlled trials were identified. Vaccination uptake varied widely and was generally low in routine clinical practice. Reported adverse events were predominantly mild and transient, with gastrointestinal symptoms being most common. Fever occurred in up to 10% of vaccinated infants. No cases of intussusception or volvulus were reported. Apnea-bradycardia episodes were inconsistently documented; where assessed, their frequency was comparable to baseline rates or to those observed after routine two-month vaccinations. Viral shedding of vaccine-strain rotavirus was frequently detected, particularly after the first dose; however, nosocomial transmission to unvaccinated infants was rare and not associated with symptomatic gastroenteritis. Overall certainty of evidence was low due to heterogeneity and moderate to high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggests that in-hospital rotavirus vaccination in clinically stable premature and medically ill infants is generally safe and not associated with relevant nosocomial infection. Nevertheless, uptake remains inconsistent. Standardized protocols, provider education, and implementation-focused strategies are needed to reduce missed vaccination opportunities and ensure timely protection in this high-risk population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION (PROSPERO): CRD420251163827.

Molecular and Cellular PediatricsVol. 13(1)
Toray (United States) (US), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), Helios Kliniken (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.