Development and validation of a risk prediction model for piecemeal resection during endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs

BACKGROUND: Piecemeal resection (PR) during endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) is associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence and incomplete resection. Identifying risk factors and developing a predictive model for PR may aid in preoperative planning and patient counseling. METHODS: This multi-center retrospective study analyzed 809 patients who underwent ER for gGISTs. Patients were divided into a training cohort (TC, n = 387), an internal validation cohort (IVC, n = 166), and an external validation cohort (EVC, n = 256). Baseline characteristics were compared between the en bloc resection and PR groups in the TC. Independent risk factors for PR were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, based on which a scoring system was developed. The model underwent internal and external validation, and its performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: In the TC, tumor size ≥ 2.5 cm (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.45, P = 0.009), irregular shape (OR = 5.03, 95% CI 2.28-11.08, P < 0.001), severe intraoperative bleeding (OR = 5.53, 95% CI 2.23-13.55, P < 0.001), and operator experience < 50 cases (OR = 4.23, 95% CI 2.10-8.73, P < 0.001) were independently associated with piecemeal resection. A scoring system based on these factors showed good predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.799 in the TC, 0.847 in the IVC, and 0.842 in an EVC. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.652 to 0.818 and 0.736 to 0.833, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a simple scoring system incorporating tumor size, shape, intraoperative bleeding, and operator experience to predict the risk of piecemeal resection during endoscopic resection of gGISTs. This tool may assist in preoperative risk stratification and optimize treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12861-y
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for piecemeal resection during endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs

Luojie Liu, Fengcheng Zang, Jian Chen, Bin He et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
article

Development and validation of a risk prediction model for piecemeal resection during endoscopic resection of gastric GISTs

Luojie Liu, Fengcheng Zang, Jian Chen, Bin He, Zhibing Wang, Xiaodan Xu, Chao Ma, Yunfu Feng
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Piecemeal resection (PR) during endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (gGISTs) is associated with an increased risk of tumor recurrence and incomplete resection. Identifying risk factors and developing a predictive model for PR may aid in preoperative planning and patient counseling. METHODS: This multi-center retrospective study analyzed 809 patients who underwent ER for gGISTs. Patients were divided into a training cohort (TC, n = 387), an internal validation cohort (IVC, n = 166), and an external validation cohort (EVC, n = 256). Baseline characteristics were compared between the en bloc resection and PR groups in the TC. Independent risk factors for PR were identified using multivariate logistic regression analysis, based on which a scoring system was developed. The model underwent internal and external validation, and its performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. RESULTS: In the TC, tumor size ≥ 2.5 cm (OR = 2.61, 95% CI 1.28-5.45, P = 0.009), irregular shape (OR = 5.03, 95% CI 2.28-11.08, P < 0.001), severe intraoperative bleeding (OR = 5.53, 95% CI 2.23-13.55, P < 0.001), and operator experience < 50 cases (OR = 4.23, 95% CI 2.10-8.73, P < 0.001) were independently associated with piecemeal resection. A scoring system based on these factors showed good predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.799 in the TC, 0.847 in the IVC, and 0.842 in an EVC. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 0.652 to 0.818 and 0.736 to 0.833, respectively. CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a simple scoring system incorporating tumor size, shape, intraoperative bleeding, and operator experience to predict the risk of piecemeal resection during endoscopic resection of gGISTs. This tool may assist in preoperative risk stratification and optimize treatment strategies.

Surgical Endoscopy
Jiangsu University (CN), Soochow University (CN), Zhangjiagang First People's Hospital (CN), First People's Hospital of Kunshan (CN), Suzhou Institute of Systems Medicine (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.