Analytical Validation of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and AscentTM Low-Pass Whole Genome Sequencing to Report on Gene Copy Number Variants in Cerebrospinal Fluid Tumor-Derived DNA

Background: Evaluation of gene-level copy number variants (CNVs) for diagnosis and therapeutic decision making has become standard of care with next-generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) being used to detect gene amplifications/deletions in tumor tissue. In contrast to most solid tumors, CNS cancers are challenging to evaluate by resection and/or biopsy due to the associated risks with invasive brain surgery that can also result in death or associated morbidity and therefore alternate methods are required.Methods: This study presents the analytical validation of using quantitative PCR (qPCR) to detect gene CNVs directly from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived DNA and from the AscentTM low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) libraries, demonstrating concordance with the gold standard of NGS/IHC/FISH used in tumor tissue. Results: The analytical sensitivity of qPCR to detect gene amplification calls for ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2) was demonstrated to be 100% and that of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) was 83%, with specificities of 96% and 100%, respectively. The analytical sensitivity of qPCR to detect gene deletions for CDKN2A/2B (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/2B) was 60% and that for MTAP (methylthioadenosine phosphorylase) was 100% with a specificity of 100% for all three genes. AscentTM was demonstrated to have a higher sensitivity (100%) when compared to qPCR for the same genes evaluated and demonstrated 100% positive agreement and 100% negative agreement with known CNV status. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that given the paucity of cells in CSF limiting the use of IHC and FISH, qPCR and AscentTM provide highly sensitive, novel, minimally invasive methods for the evaluation of gene copy number (CN) status to inform the diagnosis and management of CNS cancers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Molecular Pathology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmp7020018
Primary Topic
Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analytical Validation of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and AscentTM Low-Pass Whole Genome Sequencing to Report on Gene Copy Number Variants in Cerebrospinal Fluid Tumor-Derived DNA

Kala F. Schilter, Vindhya Udhane, Qian Nie, Viriya Keo et al.
Journal of Molecular Pathology
Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
article

Analytical Validation of Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and AscentTM Low-Pass Whole Genome Sequencing to Report on Gene Copy Number Variants in Cerebrospinal Fluid Tumor-Derived DNA

Kala F. Schilter, Vindhya Udhane, Qian Nie, Viriya Keo, Sakshi Khurana, Tarin Peltier, Kathleen Mitchell, Honey V. Reddi, Anthony Acevedo, Jennifer N. Adams, Daniel Sanchez, Alexandra Larson
article en

Abstract

Background: Evaluation of gene-level copy number variants (CNVs) for diagnosis and therapeutic decision making has become standard of care with next-generation sequencing (NGS), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) being used to detect gene amplifications/deletions in tumor tissue. In contrast to most solid tumors, CNS cancers are challenging to evaluate by resection and/or biopsy due to the associated risks with invasive brain surgery that can also result in death or associated morbidity and therefore alternate methods are required.Methods: This study presents the analytical validation of using quantitative PCR (qPCR) to detect gene CNVs directly from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-derived DNA and from the AscentTM low-pass whole genome sequencing (LP-WGS) libraries, demonstrating concordance with the gold standard of NGS/IHC/FISH used in tumor tissue. Results: The analytical sensitivity of qPCR to detect gene amplification calls for ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2) was demonstrated to be 100% and that of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) was 83%, with specificities of 96% and 100%, respectively. The analytical sensitivity of qPCR to detect gene deletions for CDKN2A/2B (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/2B) was 60% and that for MTAP (methylthioadenosine phosphorylase) was 100% with a specificity of 100% for all three genes. AscentTM was demonstrated to have a higher sensitivity (100%) when compared to qPCR for the same genes evaluated and demonstrated 100% positive agreement and 100% negative agreement with known CNV status. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that given the paucity of cells in CSF limiting the use of IHC and FISH, qPCR and AscentTM provide highly sensitive, novel, minimally invasive methods for the evaluation of gene copy number (CN) status to inform the diagnosis and management of CNS cancers.

Journal of Molecular PathologyVol. 7(2)
University of Chicago (US)
National Institutes of Health
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.