Seeing change through others' eyes: Meta‐beliefs and willingness to participate in a restorative programme in prison

Abstract Purpose The present study examines whether incarcerated individuals' meta‐malleability, the belief that others perceive them as capable of change, predicts support for restorative justice (RJ), and which emotional mechanisms moderate this influence. Moving beyond prior work on self‐perceptions, we foreground a social‐reflective lens that considers how perceived societal views shape offenders' emotions and restorative orientation. Methods A survey was administered to 173 male inmates in four prisons. Participants completed measures of meta‐malleability, support for RJ and three candidate mediators: shame, guilt and responsibility‐taking. Results Correlational analyses indicated that higher meta‐malleability was associated with stronger support for RJ and with greater guilt and responsibility. Mediation analyses showed that guilt and, most robustly, responsibility‐taking significantly mediated the meta‐malleability–RJ association. While positively correlated with RJ support, shame was not a significant mediator. Conclusions The findings identify perceived societal attitudes as a key correlate of inmates' emotional readiness for restorative processes. Conceptually, the results suggest that effective rehabilitation may require not only intrapersonal change but also shifts in the ‘social mirror’ through which offenders interpret and assess their capacity for change. Practically, prison‐based RJ preparation that highlights constructive community signals and fosters responsibility‐taking may enhance engagement with RJ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70035
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seeing change through others' eyes: Meta‐beliefs and willingness to participate in a restorative programme in prison

Inbal Peleg‐Koriat, Michal Guter, Dana Weimann-Saks
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Seeing change through others' eyes: Meta‐beliefs and willingness to participate in a restorative programme in prison

Inbal Peleg‐Koriat, Michal Guter, Dana Weimann-Saks
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The present study examines whether incarcerated individuals' meta‐malleability, the belief that others perceive them as capable of change, predicts support for restorative justice (RJ), and which emotional mechanisms moderate this influence. Moving beyond prior work on self‐perceptions, we foreground a social‐reflective lens that considers how perceived societal views shape offenders' emotions and restorative orientation. Methods A survey was administered to 173 male inmates in four prisons. Participants completed measures of meta‐malleability, support for RJ and three candidate mediators: shame, guilt and responsibility‐taking. Results Correlational analyses indicated that higher meta‐malleability was associated with stronger support for RJ and with greater guilt and responsibility. Mediation analyses showed that guilt and, most robustly, responsibility‐taking significantly mediated the meta‐malleability–RJ association. While positively correlated with RJ support, shame was not a significant mediator. Conclusions The findings identify perceived societal attitudes as a key correlate of inmates' emotional readiness for restorative processes. Conceptually, the results suggest that effective rehabilitation may require not only intrapersonal change but also shifts in the ‘social mirror’ through which offenders interpret and assess their capacity for change. Practically, prison‐based RJ preparation that highlights constructive community signals and fosters responsibility‐taking may enhance engagement with RJ.

Legal and Criminological Psychology
The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College (IL)
Israel Science Foundation
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Seeing change through others' eyes: Meta‐beliefs and willingness to participate in a restorative programme in prison — Inbal Peleg‐Koriat, Michal Guter, et al. · Legal and Criminological Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS