Remote Sensing in Rangeland Fire Ecology: Comparing Imagery to Measured Fire Behavior and Burn Severity Across Prescribed Burns and Wildfires

Wildland fire scientists have made substantial advances in measuring fire behavior, but properly collecting data is often beyond the capacity of prescribed fire managers and by definition all but impossible for wildfire events. While a method for the immediate assessment of burn severity has been developed around multispectral imagery from space-based Earth observation systems, there has been little comparison of these post hoc metrics to actual fire behavior. Meanwhile, the application of research results from experimental prescribed burns to rangeland affected by wildfire can be impeded by a lack of understanding of how immediate burn severity differs between wildfires and prescribed burns, especially in rangelands. Overall, much of what is known about wildland fire behavior, severity, and effects comes from forests, whereas rangelands are characterized by having lower fuel loads comprised of fine vegetation that promotes high rates of spread and brief residence time. This paper provides rangeland-specific information on the relationships between direct field-based fire behavior measurements and a space-based index of burn severity (differenced Normalized Burn Ratio, ΔNBR, from Sentinel-2 imagery), and uses those data to compare burn severity across 54 prescribed burns in North Dakota, USA, and 28 nearby wildfires in the US Northern Great Plains. In prescribed burns, remotely sensed burn severity increased with rate of spread and flame temperature 15 cm above the ground, but had no statistically significant relationship with soil surface temperature. In the semi-arid western zone of the Northern Great Plains, wildfires and prescribed burns had similar, low–moderate severity; wildfires in the eastern zone tended to be of moderately high severity and thus greater than the low severity of the experimental prescribed burns. By describing meaningful gradients in surface fire behavior in rangelands with ΔNBR, even those without the capacity to measure fire behavior in the field can monitor prescribed fire effectiveness and incorporate burn severity in adaptive management plans. Understanding the relationship between burn severity across wildfires and prescribed burns is a critical step in applying knowledge gained from research on prescribed fires to areas impacted by wildfire. Resistance to prescribed burning might be overcome by increasing livestock managers’ experience with post-fire forage resources through grazing areas burned in unintentional wildfires, but current practice and policy discourage or outright prevent ranchers from doing so. Future research ought to connect burn severity with ecosystem recovery metrics to ensure post-fire grazing does not impair rangeland sustainability.