Unseen Struggles–Nursing and Mental Health in Times of Covid-19

This article examines how nursing and healthcare workers’ mental health was represented in online media during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on Austria, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis, the study analyses 61 newspaper articles published between April 2020 and April 2021 to explore how psychological burden, prevention, and support were publicly discussed. The findings reveal widespread reporting of extreme workload, staff shortages, inadequate protective equipment, and emotional distress, including moral injury, burnout, and trauma. However, media discourse largely individualized responsibility by emphasizing resilience, heroism, and self-optimization, while structural determinants such as gendered, racialised, and neoliberal labour conditions remained underexamined. Psychological support initiatives were unevenly distributed, privileging hospital and ICU (intensive care unit) staff and neglecting mobile carers, nursing home workers, and migrant care workers. Overall, the analysis shows that COVID-19 intensified pre-existing systemic inequities in healthcare work and exposed the limits of symbolic recognition, underscoring the need for sustained structural reform and comprehensive mental health support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
University of Vienna
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25365/mz-2026-41-1-4
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unseen Struggles–Nursing and Mental Health in Times of Covid-19

Michaela Maria Hintermayr
University of Vienna
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Unseen Struggles–Nursing and Mental Health in Times of Covid-19

Michaela Maria Hintermayr
article en

Abstract

This article examines how nursing and healthcare workers’ mental health was represented in online media during the COVID-19 pandemic, focusing on Austria, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Drawing on Critical Discourse Analysis, the study analyses 61 newspaper articles published between April 2020 and April 2021 to explore how psychological burden, prevention, and support were publicly discussed. The findings reveal widespread reporting of extreme workload, staff shortages, inadequate protective equipment, and emotional distress, including moral injury, burnout, and trauma. However, media discourse largely individualized responsibility by emphasizing resilience, heroism, and self-optimization, while structural determinants such as gendered, racialised, and neoliberal labour conditions remained underexamined. Psychological support initiatives were unevenly distributed, privileging hospital and ICU (intensive care unit) staff and neglecting mobile carers, nursing home workers, and migrant care workers. Overall, the analysis shows that COVID-19 intensified pre-existing systemic inequities in healthcare work and exposed the limits of symbolic recognition, underscoring the need for sustained structural reform and comprehensive mental health support.

University of Vienna
Film Independent (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.