Comparative multidimensional psychosocial profiles of major depressive disorder patients with higher versus lower anhedonia burden: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Anhedonia is a core symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) and is linked to greater severity, poorer functioning, and elevated suicide risk, yet its broader psychosocial correlates in routine clinical settings remain insufficiently characterized. This study compared multidimensional psychosocial profiles between MDD patients with higher versus lower anhedonia burden. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, outpatients aged 18-45 years with MDD were recruited between January and December 2024; 125 participants with complete and valid questionnaires were included in the final analyses. Anhedonia was assessed using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). The SHAPS total score quantified anhedonia severity, and a dichotomized SHAPS score > 5 was used as an operational threshold for a higher anhedonia group. Depressive and anxiety symptoms, childhood trauma, family functioning, social support, personality traits, and dysfunctional attitudes were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 52.0% of patients were classified into the higher anhedonia group. In the lower PHQ-9-M stratum, the higher anhedonia group showed lower extraversion than the lower anhedonia group (p = 0.001; q = 0.009; Hedges' g = - 0.863, 95% CI - 1.424 to - 0.296), whereas no other prespecified higher-order measures survived FDR correction. Among patients in the higher PHQ-9-M stratum, none of the measures survived FDR correction; nominal differences were observed for dysfunctional attitudes and psychoticism. CONCLUSIONS: A higher SHAPS-based anhedonia burden was common among young adult outpatients with MDD. In PHQ-9-M stratified comparisons, psychosocial distinctions between patients with higher versus lower anhedonia burden were overall modest, with lower extraversion in the lower PHQ-9-M stratum representing the primary signal. Larger multicenter longitudinal studies using multi-method assessments are warranted to validate and better characterize anhedonia-related psychosocial profiles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08169-9
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative multidimensional psychosocial profiles of major depressive disorder patients with higher versus lower anhedonia burden: a cross-sectional study

Shaojia Lu, Qingli Mu, Yuwei Xu, Kejing Zhang et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Comparative multidimensional psychosocial profiles of major depressive disorder patients with higher versus lower anhedonia burden: a cross-sectional study

Shaojia Lu, Qingli Mu, Yuwei Xu, Kejing Zhang, Renqin Hu, Yun Ye, Yue Chen, Weili Du, Ce Zhu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anhedonia is a core symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD) and is linked to greater severity, poorer functioning, and elevated suicide risk, yet its broader psychosocial correlates in routine clinical settings remain insufficiently characterized. This study compared multidimensional psychosocial profiles between MDD patients with higher versus lower anhedonia burden. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, outpatients aged 18-45 years with MDD were recruited between January and December 2024; 125 participants with complete and valid questionnaires were included in the final analyses. Anhedonia was assessed using the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). The SHAPS total score quantified anhedonia severity, and a dichotomized SHAPS score > 5 was used as an operational threshold for a higher anhedonia group. Depressive and anxiety symptoms, childhood trauma, family functioning, social support, personality traits, and dysfunctional attitudes were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 52.0% of patients were classified into the higher anhedonia group. In the lower PHQ-9-M stratum, the higher anhedonia group showed lower extraversion than the lower anhedonia group (p = 0.001; q = 0.009; Hedges' g = - 0.863, 95% CI - 1.424 to - 0.296), whereas no other prespecified higher-order measures survived FDR correction. Among patients in the higher PHQ-9-M stratum, none of the measures survived FDR correction; nominal differences were observed for dysfunctional attitudes and psychoticism. CONCLUSIONS: A higher SHAPS-based anhedonia burden was common among young adult outpatients with MDD. In PHQ-9-M stratified comparisons, psychosocial distinctions between patients with higher versus lower anhedonia burden were overall modest, with lower extraversion in the lower PHQ-9-M stratum representing the primary signal. Larger multicenter longitudinal studies using multi-method assessments are warranted to validate and better characterize anhedonia-related psychosocial profiles.

BMC Psychiatry
Ningbo University (CN), Wenzhou Medical University (CN), Jinhua Central Hospital (CN), First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.