Parents’ Experiences of Receiving a Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) or Non-SCID T-Cell Lymphopenia Outcome During the Newborn Screening Evaluation in England

Background: In 2021, the UK National Screening Committee commissioned an evaluation of newborn bloodspot screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in England. This paper describes the experiences of parents who received an SCID or non-SCID T-cell lymphopenia (non-SCID TCL) result for their baby during the evaluation. Methods: A qualitative exploratory design was employed using semi-structured interviews with 12 parents (n = 5 who had received an SCID outcome and n = 7 who had received a non-SCID TCL following SCID NBS). Results: The impact on parents whose baby was diagnosed with SCID was complex, reflecting the experience of receiving a presymptomatic diagnosis. Parents of babies who had been diagnosed with a non-SCID TCL viewed their baby’s result in terms of risk; while their baby might still have a serious immunological condition, it was not considered to be as serious as SCID. All parents reported that they valued their participation in the SCID screening evaluation. Conclusions: Support for families following a positive screening result for SCID needs to be considered. This includes tailored psychosocial support, given their experiences will not be the same as those of parents of non-screened babies with SCID.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns12020034
Primary Topic
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parents’ Experiences of Receiving a Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) or Non-SCID T-Cell Lymphopenia Outcome During the Newborn Screening Evaluation in England

Pru Holder, Ellinor K. Olander, Louise Moody, C Musa et al.
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
article

Parents’ Experiences of Receiving a Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) or Non-SCID T-Cell Lymphopenia Outcome During the Newborn Screening Evaluation in England

Pru Holder, Ellinor K. Olander, Louise Moody, C Musa, Jim B. Chilcott, Anju D. Keetharuth, Jane Chudleigh, Fiona Ulph
article en

Abstract

Background: In 2021, the UK National Screening Committee commissioned an evaluation of newborn bloodspot screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) in England. This paper describes the experiences of parents who received an SCID or non-SCID T-cell lymphopenia (non-SCID TCL) result for their baby during the evaluation. Methods: A qualitative exploratory design was employed using semi-structured interviews with 12 parents (n = 5 who had received an SCID outcome and n = 7 who had received a non-SCID TCL following SCID NBS). Results: The impact on parents whose baby was diagnosed with SCID was complex, reflecting the experience of receiving a presymptomatic diagnosis. Parents of babies who had been diagnosed with a non-SCID TCL viewed their baby’s result in terms of risk; while their baby might still have a serious immunological condition, it was not considered to be as serious as SCID. All parents reported that they valued their participation in the SCID screening evaluation. Conclusions: Support for families following a positive screening result for SCID needs to be considered. This includes tailored psychosocial support, given their experiences will not be the same as those of parents of non-screened babies with SCID.

International Journal of Neonatal ScreeningVol. 12(2)
City, University of London (GB), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Cicely Saunders International (GB), Coventry University (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.