Refining the Multivariable Predictive‐Prognostic <scp>PREDICTR</scp> ‐ <scp>OPC</scp> Model for Survival in Surgical Escalation for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: The PREDICTR-OPC model is the only prognostic classifier for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) also predictive of surgical outcomes. Of the four biomarkers included, survivin contributes minimally and presents practical limitations. This study aimed to refine and simplify the model by removing survivin, then re-assess its prognostic predictive performance compared to the original. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a multi-center training cohort (n = 600) and an external validation cohort (n = 385) of OPSCC patients. Tumor biopsies were stained for p16, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and survivin and independently scored by at least three certified pathologists. Cox proportional hazards models assessed overall survival (OS), comparing three-biomarker (p16, HR-HPV, TILs) and four-biomarker models. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were estimated in the validation cohort, adjusting for covariates. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated performance and clinical utility. RESULTS: Among 985 patients (median age: 57 years), median OS = 8.8 years (95% CI: 6.9-10.5). The three-biomarker model yielded HR = 4.10 (95% CI: 2.41-6.98, p < 0.001) for high- vs. low-risk groups in the validation cohort, comparable to the four-biomarker model (HR = 4.24, p < 0.001). Surgery was associated with improved OS in high-risk (HR = 0.45, p = 0.001) but not low-risk (HR = 0.83, p = 0.72) patients, consistent with the original model. The models performed similarly across all metrics (e.g., Concordance Index: 0.71 vs. 0.72; Brier Score: 0.22 for both) as was model fit (Likelihood Ratio Test: p = 0.066). DCA revealed comparable clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: Removing survivin preserves PREDICTR-OPC's predictive performance, offering a more cost-effective, easier-to-implement tool for OPSCC treatment recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70611
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Refining the Multivariable Predictive‐Prognostic PREDICTR ‐ OPC Model for Survival in Surgical Escalation for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Jill Brooks, Justin Weir, Selvam Thavaraj, Ketan Shah et al.
The Laryngoscope
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Refining the Multivariable Predictive‐Prognostic PREDICTR ‐ OPC Model for Survival in Surgical Escalation for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Jill Brooks, Justin Weir, Selvam Thavaraj, Ketan Shah, Edward Odell, Stuart C. Winter, Syed Aleem Haider, Alice Sitch, Terry M. Jones, Keith Hunter, Sandra V. von Zeidler, Pawel Golusinski, Paul Matthews, C. Max Robinson, Catharine M. West, Hisham Mehanna, Caroline Kristunas, Lauren L. Zhang, Paul Nankivell
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The PREDICTR-OPC model is the only prognostic classifier for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) also predictive of surgical outcomes. Of the four biomarkers included, survivin contributes minimally and presents practical limitations. This study aimed to refine and simplify the model by removing survivin, then re-assess its prognostic predictive performance compared to the original. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed a multi-center training cohort (n = 600) and an external validation cohort (n = 385) of OPSCC patients. Tumor biopsies were stained for p16, high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) DNA, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and survivin and independently scored by at least three certified pathologists. Cox proportional hazards models assessed overall survival (OS), comparing three-biomarker (p16, HR-HPV, TILs) and four-biomarker models. Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS were estimated in the validation cohort, adjusting for covariates. Discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) evaluated performance and clinical utility. RESULTS: Among 985 patients (median age: 57 years), median OS = 8.8 years (95% CI: 6.9-10.5). The three-biomarker model yielded HR = 4.10 (95% CI: 2.41-6.98, p < 0.001) for high- vs. low-risk groups in the validation cohort, comparable to the four-biomarker model (HR = 4.24, p < 0.001). Surgery was associated with improved OS in high-risk (HR = 0.45, p = 0.001) but not low-risk (HR = 0.83, p = 0.72) patients, consistent with the original model. The models performed similarly across all metrics (e.g., Concordance Index: 0.71 vs. 0.72; Brier Score: 0.22 for both) as was model fit (Likelihood Ratio Test: p = 0.066). DCA revealed comparable clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: Removing survivin preserves PREDICTR-OPC's predictive performance, offering a more cost-effective, easier-to-implement tool for OPSCC treatment recommendations.

The Laryngoscope
Poznan University of Medical Sciences (PL), University Malaya Medical Centre (MY), University of Liverpool (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham (GB), Breast Cancer Now (GB), Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University Hospital Coventry (GB), University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (GB), John Radcliffe Hospital (GB), University of Malaya (MY), University of Oxford (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (GB), NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), University of Zielona Góra (PL), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR), Columbia University (US), University of Birmingham (GB)
Cancer Research UK
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.