Students' Emotional Responses to Mistakes: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study in University Chemistry Laboratory

ABSTRACT This study explores students' emotions in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory, focusing particularly on emotional responses to making mistakes. Using an ecological momentary assessment design, we collected on‐task data from 240 students and 1635 learning situations during the laboratory sessions. A multilevel structural equation modeling framework, including a model with random slopes, was used to examine how situational factors (i.e., type of mistake and support in solving the mistake) and individual factor (i.e., gender, performance level, and subjective task values) affected students' emotional responses. Our findings suggest that mistakes typically trigger negative activating emotions in students. Individual factors also influenced emotional responses—well‐performing students were less prone to elevated anxiety and frustration, remaining more relaxed in mistake situations, whereas students with high perceived emotional costs of laboratory activities experienced a more intense increase in anxiety in mistake situations. The type of mistake played an important role: careless mistakes were associated with more positive emotions, whereas students experienced increased anxiety and frustration and decreased positive emotions when the mistake stemmed from skill or knowledge gaps. The form of support also mattered: teacher support was linked to intensified anxiety and frustration in students, while peer support showed no statistically significant impacts on emotional levels. To foster meaningful learning, targeted support in emotional regulation should be provided for lower‐performing students and those with high perceived emotional costs in mistake situations, particularly when mistakes stem from a lack of skill or knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science Education
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.70079
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students' Emotional Responses to Mistakes: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study in University Chemistry Laboratory

Veli-Matti Vesterinen, Mikko‐Jussi Laakso, Elisa Vilhunen, Pei‐Hsin Li et al.
Science Education
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Students' Emotional Responses to Mistakes: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study in University Chemistry Laboratory

Veli-Matti Vesterinen, Mikko‐Jussi Laakso, Elisa Vilhunen, Pei‐Hsin Li, Reetta Kyynäräinen
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explores students' emotions in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory, focusing particularly on emotional responses to making mistakes. Using an ecological momentary assessment design, we collected on‐task data from 240 students and 1635 learning situations during the laboratory sessions. A multilevel structural equation modeling framework, including a model with random slopes, was used to examine how situational factors (i.e., type of mistake and support in solving the mistake) and individual factor (i.e., gender, performance level, and subjective task values) affected students' emotional responses. Our findings suggest that mistakes typically trigger negative activating emotions in students. Individual factors also influenced emotional responses—well‐performing students were less prone to elevated anxiety and frustration, remaining more relaxed in mistake situations, whereas students with high perceived emotional costs of laboratory activities experienced a more intense increase in anxiety in mistake situations. The type of mistake played an important role: careless mistakes were associated with more positive emotions, whereas students experienced increased anxiety and frustration and decreased positive emotions when the mistake stemmed from skill or knowledge gaps. The form of support also mattered: teacher support was linked to intensified anxiety and frustration in students, while peer support showed no statistically significant impacts on emotional levels. To foster meaningful learning, targeted support in emotional regulation should be provided for lower‐performing students and those with high perceived emotional costs in mistake situations, particularly when mistakes stem from a lack of skill or knowledge.

Science Education
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Turku (FI)
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.