Beyond adoption models: a context-sensitive framework for understanding metaverse integration in higher education

Purpose This study aims to create a clear framework for understanding how the metaverse is adopted in higher education, with particular attention to contextual, institutional and governance-related differences. While previous research has examined adoption from different angles, there is still no unified model that incorporates the various factors affecting adoption at the individual, pedagogical, technological, organizational, environmental, ethical and societal levels. Design/methodology/approach The framework is built through a review of existing literature. This study conducted a structured review of 76 peer-reviewed publications, including 67 journal articles, 3 conference papers, 5 book chapters and 1 other source. These were published from 2015 onward in major academic databases, focusing on studies that looked at adoption, acceptance, readiness or governance of the metaverse and related immersive technologies in higher education. A concept-focused synthesis helped organize adoption factors into seven connected themes. The references include 9 studies at the individual level, 11 at the pedagogical level, 10 at the technological level, 10 at the organizational level, 14 on environmental factors, 8 on ethical and governance issues and 10 on societal and future readiness. Findings The review shows that adoption is a complex process with connections across different levels. The study needs to consider individual readiness, pedagogical design and technological infrastructure together with organizational strategy, environmental pressures, ethical concerns and long-term societal effects. The proposed framework reflects these relationships by combining evidence from 76 studies into a structured overview across seven layers. Rather than assuming uniform adoption trajectories, the framework emphasizes how institutional context, governance conditions and resource asymmetries shape the feasibility, form and consequences of metaverse adoption across higher education systems. Originality/value By bringing together ideas from different theories and past studies, this paper presents a practical framework that enhances our understanding of how higher education can adopt the Metaverse. The framework not only offers a basis for future empirical testing but also provides a critical analytical lens for educators, institutions and policymakers to evaluate, adapt or contest Metaverse-based initiatives in light of institutional priorities, ethical responsibilities and contextual constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-11-2025-0313
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond adoption models: a context-sensitive framework for understanding metaverse integration in higher education

Mousa Al-kfairy, Omar Alfandi, Souheil Khaddaj
Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Beyond adoption models: a context-sensitive framework for understanding metaverse integration in higher education

Mousa Al-kfairy, Omar Alfandi, Souheil Khaddaj
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to create a clear framework for understanding how the metaverse is adopted in higher education, with particular attention to contextual, institutional and governance-related differences. While previous research has examined adoption from different angles, there is still no unified model that incorporates the various factors affecting adoption at the individual, pedagogical, technological, organizational, environmental, ethical and societal levels. Design/methodology/approach The framework is built through a review of existing literature. This study conducted a structured review of 76 peer-reviewed publications, including 67 journal articles, 3 conference papers, 5 book chapters and 1 other source. These were published from 2015 onward in major academic databases, focusing on studies that looked at adoption, acceptance, readiness or governance of the metaverse and related immersive technologies in higher education. A concept-focused synthesis helped organize adoption factors into seven connected themes. The references include 9 studies at the individual level, 11 at the pedagogical level, 10 at the technological level, 10 at the organizational level, 14 on environmental factors, 8 on ethical and governance issues and 10 on societal and future readiness. Findings The review shows that adoption is a complex process with connections across different levels. The study needs to consider individual readiness, pedagogical design and technological infrastructure together with organizational strategy, environmental pressures, ethical concerns and long-term societal effects. The proposed framework reflects these relationships by combining evidence from 76 studies into a structured overview across seven layers. Rather than assuming uniform adoption trajectories, the framework emphasizes how institutional context, governance conditions and resource asymmetries shape the feasibility, form and consequences of metaverse adoption across higher education systems. Originality/value By bringing together ideas from different theories and past studies, this paper presents a practical framework that enhances our understanding of how higher education can adopt the Metaverse. The framework not only offers a basis for future empirical testing but also provides a critical analytical lens for educators, institutions and policymakers to evaluate, adapt or contest Metaverse-based initiatives in light of institutional priorities, ethical responsibilities and contextual constraints.

Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society
Kingston University London (GB), Kingston University (US), Zayed University (AE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.