A Comparative Analysis of the Properties of Coal Liquefaction Residues and Limestone Fine Aggregates

Coal liquefaction residues (CLRs), including both indirect (ICLR) and direct (DCLR) variants, represent industrial by-products whose conventional landfill disposal raises environmental concerns. This study comparatively analyzes ICLR and DCLR properties against limestone fine aggregates through physicochemical characterization. Results indicate that ICLR contains predominant SiO2 crystalline phases (50.05%) with trace Fe-Ti-Al-Mg oxides, demonstrating higher Vickers hardness (615 HV vs. 246 HV for limestone) and elastic modulus (98 GPa vs. 81 GPa for limestone), while its apparent relative density (2.612) closely matches that of limestone (2.783). Conversely, DCLR features abundant carbonaceous components (75.9% C) with olefinic/aromatic structures (asphaltene content 66.2%), exhibiting lower mechanical strength (Vickers hardness 21 HV) but enhanced asphalt affinity, as indicated by strong C=C (1591 cm−1) and aromatic C–H (744 cm−1) absorption peaks in FTIR. Both CLRs share comparable gradation curves and micromorphological characteristics with limestone aggregates, including uniform surface scaly textures. While pore-size distributions differ minimally between CLRs, both present finer porosity than limestone and show no leachate toxicity risks, confirming their viability as sustainable alternatives to asphalt fine aggregates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19101994
Primary Topic
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Properties of Coal Liquefaction Residues and Limestone Fine Aggregates

J H Li, Pengfei Li, Shuangfeng Guo, Hao Wu et al.
Materials
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Properties of Coal Liquefaction Residues and Limestone Fine Aggregates

J H Li, Pengfei Li, Shuangfeng Guo, Hao Wu, Mingliang Li, Zhe Wang
article en

Abstract

Coal liquefaction residues (CLRs), including both indirect (ICLR) and direct (DCLR) variants, represent industrial by-products whose conventional landfill disposal raises environmental concerns. This study comparatively analyzes ICLR and DCLR properties against limestone fine aggregates through physicochemical characterization. Results indicate that ICLR contains predominant SiO2 crystalline phases (50.05%) with trace Fe-Ti-Al-Mg oxides, demonstrating higher Vickers hardness (615 HV vs. 246 HV for limestone) and elastic modulus (98 GPa vs. 81 GPa for limestone), while its apparent relative density (2.612) closely matches that of limestone (2.783). Conversely, DCLR features abundant carbonaceous components (75.9% C) with olefinic/aromatic structures (asphaltene content 66.2%), exhibiting lower mechanical strength (Vickers hardness 21 HV) but enhanced asphalt affinity, as indicated by strong C=C (1591 cm−1) and aromatic C–H (744 cm−1) absorption peaks in FTIR. Both CLRs share comparable gradation curves and micromorphological characteristics with limestone aggregates, including uniform surface scaly textures. While pore-size distributions differ minimally between CLRs, both present finer porosity than limestone and show no leachate toxicity risks, confirming their viability as sustainable alternatives to asphalt fine aggregates.

MaterialsVol. 19(10)
Nanjing Tech University (CN), Chongqing Technology and Business University (CN), Chongqing University of Science and Technology (CN), Ministry of Transport (CN), Research Institute of Highway (CN), Beijing Municipal Engineering Design and Research Institute (China) (CN), Chongqing University of Technology (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.